Wireless Network Problem Incidence Increases as Texting and Web Use Grows
Verizon Wireless Ranks Highest in Wireless Network Quality Performance in All Six Regions
WESTLAKE VILLAGE, Calif., March 5, 2015 /PRNewswire/ -- As the incidence of texting and Web use grows, so does the incidence of wireless network problems, with the year-over-year increase driven primarily by issues with data services, including phone and mobile broadband Web, according to the J.D. Power 2015 U.S. Wireless Network Quality Performance StudySM—Volume 1 released today.
Now in its 13th year, the semiannual study is based on 10 problem areas of the customer experience: dropped calls; calls not connected; audio issues; failed/late voicemails; lost calls; text transmission failures; late text message notifications; Web connection errors; slow downloads; and email connection errors. Network performance issues are measured as problems per 100 (PP100) network connections, with a lower score reflecting fewer problems and better network performance. Carrier performance is examined in six geographic regions: Northeast, Mid-Atlantic, Southeast, North Central, Southwest and West. In addition to evaluating the network quality experienced by customers with wireless phones, the study also measures the network performance of tablets and mobile broadband devices.
According to the study, data-related issues, including phone and mobile Web problems, have steadily increased from 2014. The average number of problems with mobile Web connections, excessively slow mobile Web loading, and email connection errors has increased to 17 PP100 in 2015 Vol. 1 from 14 PP100 in 2014 Vol. 1.
The volume of texting has also increased, with 47 texts sent/received over a 48-hour period, on average, compared with 42 texts in 2014 Vol. 1. Additionally, the average number of phone mobile Web interactions occurring over a 48-hour period is higher year over year (16 vs. 14, respectively).
"Smartphone users send a high volume of calls, text messages and emails, which strains carrier networks. As tablet ownership continues to rise, increased frequency of mobile video downloads further exacerbates network strain," said Kirk Parsons, senior director and practice leader of telecommunications at J.D. Power. "Given the increase in network connection problems, carriers providing faster and more reliable connections may have a competitive advantage, particularly for cellular tablet owners, who have a high propensity to switch carriers in pursuit of quality connections."
KEY FINDINGS
- Overall wireless network quality problem incidence is 13 PP100 network connections vs. 12 PP100 in 2014 Vol. 1.
- On average, wireless customers experience the highest number of data quality problems on their mobile broadband device (27 PP100), followed by tablet (16 PP100) and phone (17 PP100).
- While 14 percent of wireless customers indicate having a tablet with a data plan from their wireless carrier, 9 percent have a mobile broadband device, such as an aircard or hotspot.
- When examining types of data problems, email connection errors occur more frequently on tablets than phones (7 PP100 vs. 6 PP100, respectively). In contrast, issues related to slow mobile Web connections are more likely to occur on phones (16 PP100) than on mobile broadband devices (14 PP100) and tablets (12 PP100).
- Cellular tablet owners are willing to switch carriers if a competitor can offer faster, more reliable connections at a comparable price. Although satisfaction among customers with cellular tablets is higher overall, 24 percent of those customers say they "definitely will" or "probably will" switch their carrier within the next year, compared with just 15 percent of customers without a cellular tablet.
Study Rankings
Verizon Wireless ranks highest in all six regions—Northeast; Mid-Atlantic; Southeast; North Central; Southwest; and West—with typically lower PP100 scores in call quality, messaging quality and data quality.
The 2015 U.S. Wireless Network Quality Performance Study—Volume 1 is based on responses from 27,065 wireless customers. The study was fielded from July 2014 through December 2014.
| Wireless Network Quality PP100 Rankings |
J.D. Power.com Power Circle RatingsTM |
|||||
| (Based on Problems Per 100 Mobile Device Interactions) |
For Consumers |
|||||
| Northeast Region |
||||||
| Verizon Wireless |
11 |
5 |
||||
| AT&T |
13 |
3 |
||||
| Northeast Average |
13 |
3 |
||||
| T-Mobile |
16 |
2 |
||||
| Sprint Nextel |
18 |
2 |
||||
| Note: Included in the Northeast Region are Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island and Vermont |
||||||
| Mid-Atlantic Region |
||||||
| Verizon Wireless |
9 |
5 |
||||
| AT&T |
11 |
3 |
||||
| Mid-Atlantic Average |
11 |
3 |
||||
| T-Mobile |
14 |
2 |
||||
| Sprint Nextel |
16 |
2 |
||||
| Note: Included in the Mid-Atlantic Region are Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Virginia and West Virginia |
||||||
| Southeast Region |
||||||
| Verizon Wireless |
10 |
5 |
||||
| AT&T |
13 |
3 |
||||
| Southeast Average |
13 |
3 |
||||
| T-Mobile |
16 |
2 |
||||
| Sprint Nextel |
17 |
2 |
||||
| Note: Included in the Southeast Region are Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee |
||||||
| North Central Region |
||||||
| Verizon Wireless |
10 |
5 |
||||
| AT&T |
12 |
3 |
||||
| North Central Average |
12 |
3 |
||||
| Sprint Nextel |
14 |
2 |
||||
| T-Mobile |
15 |
2 |
||||
| Note: Included in the North Central Region are Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio and Wisconsin |
||||||
| Southwest Region |
||||||
| Verizon Wireless |
9 |
5 |
||||
| AT&T |
12 |
4 |
||||
| Southwest Average |
13 |
3 |
||||
| T-Mobile |
14 |
3 |
||||
| Sprint Nextel |
16 |
2 |
||||
| Note: Included in the Southwest Region are Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas |
||||||
| West Region |
||||||
| Verizon Wireless |
11 |
5 |
||||
| AT&T |
13 |
3 |
||||
| West Average |
13 |
3 |
||||
| T-Mobile |
14 |
3 |
||||
| Sprint Nextel |
17 |
2 |
||||
| Note: Included in the West Region are Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington and Wyoming |
||||||
Power Circle Ratings Legend
5 – Among the best
4 – Better than most
3 – About average
2 – The rest
Media Relations Contacts
John Tews; Troy, Mich.; 248-680-6218; [email protected]
About J.D. Power and Advertising/Promotional Rules www.jdpower.com/about-us/press-release-info
About McGraw Hill Financial www.mhfi.com
Logo - http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20130605/LA26502LOGO
SOURCE J.D. Power
Related Links
WANT YOUR COMPANY'S NEWS FEATURED ON PRNEWSWIRE.COM?
Newsrooms &
Influencers
Digital Media
Outlets
Journalists
Opted In
Share this article