TORONTO, Sept. 10, 2013 /CNW/ - Mandalay Resources Corporation ("Mandalay" or the "Company") (TSX: MND) is pleased to provide the following update for its Costerfield gold-antimony mine in Victoria, Australia:
All dollar amounts presented in this press release are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated.
The PEA was prepared by SRK Consulting (Australasia) Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia ("SRK") and the full technical report will be filed on SEDAR and the Company's website within 45 days of this news release.
The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes Inferred Mineral Resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as Mineral Reserves, and there is no certainty that the PEA based on these Mineral Resources will be realized. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
Brad Mills, CEO of Mandalay, commented, "The PEA suggests that the Cuffley lode is a robust project that could potentially extend the Costerfield mine life to at least the second quarter of 2017. During this four-year period, the Company could potentially produce a total of approximately 129,000 oz of saleable Au and 12,000 t of saleable Sb, amounting to approximately 214,000 saleable oz Au Eq. We intend to infill nearly all of the Inferred Resources modeled for extraction in the PEA in order to increase confidence to the Indicated level by early 2014. We also expect that much of this material will be converted to Probable Reserves with the first development of Cuffley mining levels (assuming demonstration of local grade continuity and mineability) by the end of 2013, making for a very low risk project. Total capital for the four-year Life of Mine ("LOM") is $28 million; approximately half of the total is for capital development and approximately a third of the total will be spent during 2013 simply developing initial access and first vein drives to demonstrate local grade continuity and mineability. Recent performance of the mine has demonstrated the Company's ability to operate continuously in the 10,000 to 12,000 tonnes per month ("t/m") range at low unit costs; this performance is expected to continue. At the conservative metal prices of the PEA, we expect that Costerfield can nearly self-fund the Cuffley investment during the peak investment period from now through the first quarter of 2014, with any remainder contributed from the Company's current cash position. The LOM cash operating cost is projected to average approximately $766/oz Au Eq., and the LOM total cost (operating plus capital cost) to average approximately $898/oz Au Eq. The Cuffley lode is expected to support a significant increase in mine production to 60,000 to 65,000 oz Au Eq. per year from the high-grade core of the lode through mid-2015. The Company will then have an option to increase the rate of mining and processing to approximately 15,000 t/m. We believe this will make it possible to sustain the high rate of annual metal production as the mill feed grades decline during the last two years of the current PEA study period. We intend to drill intensively between now and mid-year 2014 to demonstrate sufficient additional resources to justify the investment in the electrical power upgrade and mill expansion required for that 15,000 t/m rate, while adding to mine life at the expanded rate."
Mr. Mills continued, "The completion of the PEA and commitment of associated investments is a clear example of Mandalay's strategy in action. Costerfield was acquired in late 2009 on care and maintenance with no NI 43-101 compliant Mineral Resources or Mineral Reserves. It was promptly restarted, and in 2010 it produced 15,872 oz Au Eq. at a cash cost of $936/oz Au Eq. Over the last three years, it has funded itself to the following achievements:, improved safety and environmental performance; a sustainable staffing level; conversion to a new, more efficient mining method; a nearly doubled mining and processing rate; significantly reduced unit costs; and exploration success to support the nominal four-year mine life described by the PEA. Today the future looks bright, with good margins being achieved even at the recent low gold and antimony prices and with significantly more exploration potential to test going forward. We expect Costerfield to emerge as an even more significant value contributor to Mandalay as it achieves this next phase of growth over the coming months."
Highlights of the PEA
Table 1: Mineral Resources of the Cuffley lode as of June 30, 2013 | ||||||||||
Resource | Tonnes (t) |
Sb Grade (%) |
Sb Contained (t) |
Au Grade (g/t) |
Au Contained (oz) |
|||||
Measured | - | - | - | - | - | |||||
Indicated | 133,000 | 5.4 | 7,000 | 16.9 | 72,000 | |||||
Measured + Indicated | 133,000 | 5.3 | 7,000 | 16.8 | 72,000 | |||||
Inferred | 273,000 | 3.2 | 9,000 | 10.4 | 91,000 |
1. | Mineral Resources stated as of June 30, 2013. |
2. | Mineral Resource estimate used relevant sample data as of June 30, 2013. |
3. | Tonnes resource and Sb rounded to nearest thousand; oz Au rounded to nearest thousand. |
4. | Mineral Resources stated according to CIM guidelines and include Mineral Reserves. |
5. | A 3.6 g/t Au Eq. cut-off grade over a minimum mining width of 1.8 m is applied where Au Eq. is calculated at a gold price of $1,400/oz and an antimony price of $12,000/t. |
6. | The cut-off grade has decreased from 4.7 g/t Au Eq. used in the December 31, 2012, Mineral Resource estimate due to changes in metal price assumptions, updated cost experience, recoveries and other assumptions. |
7. | Mineral Resource estimate supervised and approved by Dr. Andrew Fowler, AMC Consultants Pty, BSc, PhD, MAIG and MAusIMM CP (Geo), who is a qualified person under NI 43-101. |
The infill drilling carried out in the first two quarters of 2013 accomplished the goal of increasing the certainty around the PEA resource: relative to the end-of-2012 estimate, the June 30, 2013 estimate contains more tonnes of resource, more contained Sb and more contained Au in the Indicated Resource category and slightly less in the Inferred Resource category.
Table 2: Mineral Resource of the entire Costerfield property included in the PEA | ||||||||||
Resource | Tonnes (t) |
Sb Grade (%) |
Sb Contained (t) |
Au Grade (g/t) |
Au Contained (oz) |
|||||
Measured | 184,000 | 4.3% | 8,000 | 7.1 | 42,000 | |||||
Indicated | 534,000 | 3.7% | 20,000 | 11.1 | 190,000 | |||||
Measured + Indicated | 718,000 | 3.9% | 28,000 | 10.1 | 232,000 | |||||
Inferred | 680,000 | 2.6% | 18,000 | 6.4 | 140,000 |
1. | Mineral Resources estimated as of December 31, 2012, and depleted for production through April 30, 2013, except for Cuffley lode for which Mineral Resources are stated as of June 30, 2013. |
2. | Mineral Resources stated according to CIM guidelines and include Mineral Reserves. |
3. | Tonnes resource and Sb rounded to nearest thousand; oz Au rounded to nearest thousand. |
4. | A 3.6 g/t Au Eq. cut-off grade over a minimum mining width of 1.8 m is applied where Au Eq. is calculated at a gold price of $1,400/oz and an antimony price of $12,000/t. |
5. | The cut-off grade has decreased from 4.7 g/t Au Eq. used in the December 31, 2012, Mineral Resource estimate due to changes in metal price assumptions, updated cost experience, recoveries and other assumptions. |
6. | Mineral Resource estimate supervised and approved by Dr. Andrew Fowler, AMC Consultants Pty, BSc, PhD, MAIG and MAusIMM CP (Geo), who is a qualified person under NI 43-101. |
Relative to the total property-wide resource at the end of 2012, this represents 35% more contained Sb and 44% more contained Au in the Measured plus Indicated categories. It represents 9% less Sb and unchanged Au in the Inferred Resource category. These changes are mostly due to a decrease in the cutoff grade from 4.7 to 3.6 g/t Au Eq. used in the respective estimates (based on recent operating experience) and to a change in the definition of sterilized resource in the Augusta lodes (based on revised mine design).
Based on the robust results of the PEA, the Company is continuing capital development for the rest of the year at the current rate of capital development spending in order to complete the Cuffley decline, establish infrastructure at the bottom of the decline, and accomplish the on-vein secondary development required to demonstrate short-range continuity and mineability of the Mineral Resources. The Company anticipates mining approximately 4,000 t of Cuffley material by the end of 2013.
The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes Inferred Mineral Resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as Mineral Reserves, and there is no certainty that the PEA based on these Mineral Resources will be realized. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
Drilling highlights
Drilling continued on the N-lode and Cuffley lode through July 30, 2013. The goal of this program was to define sufficient Inferred Resource to support the PEA as well as upgrade sufficient Inferred Resource to Indicated Resource to reduce the risk of the project.
The Company has approved continuing the current rate of drilling (three rigs) through the end of the year to continue resource extension and infill drilling with the goal of adding as much Mineral Resources and converting as much Mineral Resources to Mineral Reserves by the end of the year as possible.
Costerfield drilling, sampling, and assaying
From January 1 to July 30, 2013, Mandalay drilled 13,416 m in 53 holes for approximately $2.9 million. In addition, the Company completed 3,123 m of on-vein operating development and took an associated 746 face samples of the E-, W-, and N-lodes in the Augusta mine.
Drill core was logged and sampled by Costerfield geologists, who also performed mine sampling of the development advances. All samples were sent to Onsite Labs in Bendigo, Victoria, Australia, for sample preparation and assay. Site geological and metallurgical personnel have implemented a QA/QC process that includes the regular submission of standard reference materials and blanks with drill and face samples submitted for assay. Standard reference materials have been certified by Geostats Pty Ltd. (see Costerfield Technical Report filed March 28, 2013, which contains a complete description of drilling, sampling, assaying and data verification procedures).
Costerfield drill results
For the locations of the N-lode, Cuffley lode, and W-lode, please click here for figure 1.
N-lode
Drilling results for N-lode appear in Table 3. Please click here for figure 2, which displays drill results and mine sampling results as long section.
Table 3: N-lode drill results
Hole ID | Hole Completion Date |
Intercept Northing (Mine Grid, m) |
Intercept Easting (Mine Grid, m) |
Relative Elevation (m) |
*True Width (m) |
Gold Grade (g/t) |
Antimony Grade (%) |
Hole Depth (m) |
MH239 | 3/Dec/12 | 4588 | 15312 | 984 | 0.210 | 101.8 | 45.2 | 171.7 |
MH309 | 19/Dec/12 | 4593 | 15292 | 880 | 0.110 | 98.1 | 46.3 | 215.8 |
MH331 | 18/Mar/13 | 4523 | 15306 | 858 | 1.260 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 252.3 |
MH333 | 21/Feb/13 | 4479 | 15312 | 849 | 0.129 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 402.3 |
MH334 | 4/Mar/13 | 4435 | 15313 | 843 | 0.112 | 0.6 | 8.2 | 407.0 |
MH335 | 12/Mar/13 | 4632 | 15307 | 952 | 0.116 | 68.9 | 38.5 | 411.5 |
MH336 | 26/Mar/13 | 4638 | 15299 | 905 | 0.334 | 113.2 | 59.5 | 402.4 |
MH337 | 8/Apr/13 | 4641 | 15294 | 854 | 0.282 | 24.6 | 45.8 | 459.4 |
MH338 | 12/Apr/13 | 4607 | 15289 | 847 | 0.192 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 250.2 |
MH339 | 17/Apr/13 | 4527 | 15307 | 891 | 0.328 | 45.2 | 42.3 | 276.2 |
MH341 | 29/Apr/13 | 4590 | 15296 | 932 | 0.450 | 80.1 | 46.0 | 437.4 |
MH348 | 3/May/13 | 4636 | 15322 | 985 | 0.417 | 22.6 | 3.0 | 195.1 |
MH349 | 8/May/13 | 4663 | 15307 | 939 | 0.212 | 118.9 | 36.9 | 229.2 |
MH350 | 13/May/13 | 4638 | 15297 | 883 | 0.338 | 166.5 | 46.0 | 249.5 |
MH351 | 16/May/13 | 4707 | 15341 | 1039 | 0.090 | 99.2 | 23.1 | 201.1 |
MH352A | 22/May/13 | 4700 | 15321 | 976 | 0.083 | 17.8 | 11.1 | 221.2 |
MB023 | 16/Jan/13 | 4859 | 15343 | 964 | 0.120 | 13.0 | 16.8 | 344.6 |
MB025 | 18/Dec/12 | 5009 | 15373 | 1022 | 0.080 | 4.7 | 14.5 | 305.6 |
MB024 | 2/Apr/13 | 4704 | 15342 | 1064 | 0.333 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 163.0 |
MB027 | 11/Apr/13 | 4773 | 15339 | 1019 | 0.676 | 41.6 | 21.2 | 241.4 |
MB029 | 10/May/13 | 4731 | 15345 | 1031 | 0.068 | 9.1 | 2.1 | 242.8 |
MB028 | 22/Apr/13 | 4774 | 15340 | 972 | 0.160 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 288.3 |
MB031 | 7/Jun/13 | 4717 | 15334 | 962 | 1.750 | 3.8 | 1.8 | 380.4 |
MB032 | 21/Jun/13 | 4757 | 15350 | 990 | 1.310 | 64.9 | 2.8 | 380.7 |
On the N-lode long section (click here), it can be seen that the new drill results have extended the limits of mineralization approximately 50-100 m north of the limits of Measured, Indicated, and Inferred Resources in the December 31, 2012, Mineral Resource Estimate. As well, recent face sampling of the 10 m-spaced upper levels of N-lode have extended high-grade mineralization beyond the limits of previously Measured Resources out into Indicated, Inferred, and even previously un-estimated areas of the lode. Continued drilling is expected to extend the limits and fill in mineralization in N-lode; significant resource additions in all categories are anticipated by year-end.
Cuffley lode
Drilling results for Cuffley lode appear in Table 4. Please click here for figure 3, which displays drill results in long section.
Table 4: Cuffley lode drill results
Hole ID | Hole Completion Date |
Intercept Northing (Mine Grid, m) |
Intercept Easting (Mine Grid, m) |
Relative Elevation (m) |
*True Width (m) |
Gold Grade (g/t) |
Antimony Grade (%) |
Hole Depth (m) |
AD022W1 | 8/Feb/13 | 5007 | 15178 | 737 | 0.123 | 101.4 | 5.9 | 593.4 |
MH333 | 21/Feb/13 | 4493 | 15114 | 783 | 0.068 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 402.3 |
MH334 | 1/Mar/13 | 4402 | 15105 | 767 | 0.120 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 407.0 |
AD022W3 | 3/Apr/13 | 4982 | 15180 | 784 | 1.105 | 2.4 | 0.6 | 458.5 |
MH336 | 26/Mar/13 | 4688 | 15183 | 814 | 0.958 | 0.3 | 2.5 | 402.4 |
MH335 | 12/Mar/13 | 4692 | 15152 | 875 | 1.904 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 411.5 |
AD026 | 28/Feb/13 | 4864 | 15156 | 744 | 0.361 | 18.1 | 0.6 | 543.3 |
AD026W1 | 22/Mar/13 | 4871 | 15150 | 691 | 0.709 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 606.2 |
MH337 | 8/Apr/13 | 4691 | 15189 | 740 | 0.091 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 459.4 |
AD030 | 15/Apr/13 | 5011 | 15185 | 990 | 0.330 | 39.7 | 25.6 | 245.6 |
AD031 | 26/Apr/13 | 4988 | 15183 | 1037 | 0.960 | 12.5 | 8.4 | 251.6 |
MH341 | 29/Apr/13 | 4610 | 15121 | 832 | 0.139 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 437.4 |
MB018 | 29/Apr/13 | 4789 | 15126 | 713 | 0.210 | 6.3 | 3.4 | 680.4 |
AD032 | 8/May/13 | 4964 | 15173 | 992 | 1.038 | 106.2 | 17.4 | 255.6 |
AD039 | 22/May/13 | 4991 | 15195 | 918 | 0.146 | 32.8 | 33.0 | 386.3 |
AD040 | 6/Jun/13 | 4955 | 15187 | 890 | 0.696 | 7.0 | 1.9 | 434.6 |
AD041 | 20/Jun/13 | 4966 | 15186 | 915 | 0.102 | 16.4 | 12.7 | 329.7 |
AD042 | 3/Jul/13 | 4925 | 15189 | 935 | 0.602 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 316.4 |
AD051 | 16/Jul/13 | 4793 | 15171 | 920 | 0.816 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 276.2 |
* True widths may vary from those used in resource estimation |
In the long section, the impact of new intercepts in extending the volume of Indicated Resources can be seen. As well, several new intercepts, although too sparse to support Inferred Resources, suggest extension of mineralization more than 100 m below the limits of Inferred Resources.
W-Lode
Drilling results for W-lode appear in Table 5.
Table 5: W-lode drill results
Hole ID | Hole Completion Date |
Intercept Northing (Mine Grid, m) |
Intercept Easting (Mine Grid, m) |
Relative Elevation (m) |
*True Width (m) |
Gold Grade (g/t) |
Antimony Grade (%) |
Hole Depth (m) |
MH325 | 11/Dec/12 | 4460 | 15314 | 853 | 0.150 | 11.9 | 15.8 | 209.9 |
MH271 | 24/Jan/13 | 4323 | 15295 | 914 | 0.280 | 46.3 | 41.0 | 330.7 |
MH334 | 4/Mar/13 | 4437 | 15321 | 846 | 0.118 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 407.0 |
MH333 | 21/Feb/13 | 4479 | 15314 | 850 | 0.079 | 197.1 | 0.2 | 402.3 |
* True widths may vary from those used in resource estimation |
These four holes were drilled to infill previously Inferred Resources in the lowest planned levels of W-lode and yielded the expected mixed results. W-lode resources will be re-estimated at year-end to include the impact of these holes, plus the mine sampling and depletion accomplished during the balance of 2013.
Resource update
The Mineral Resource was estimated using a block model and a 2 dimensional ("2D") accumulation method. All relevant diamond drillhole and underground face samples in the Costerfield property, available as of December 31, 2012, for the E, W, NE, NW, and P-lodes, and as of June 30, 2013, for the Cuffley lode were used to inform the estimate. Mineral Resources for C-lode and Brunswick have not been re-estimated since they were last reported in 2009. No drilling or mining has occurred on these structures since then. Resources in all lodes are restated here for consistency with an updated cut-off grade of 3.6 g/t Au Eq. and a 1.8 m minimum mining width criteria based on PEA technical assumptions, price assumptions, and recent operating cost experience.
The method used to estimate the Au and Sb grades and thickness into a 2D block model required that Au and Sb were multiplied by true thickness (called Au accumulation and Sb accumulation), to correctly assign weights to composites of different lengths during estimation. The estimation method was ordinary kriging, where there were sufficient sample pairs for meaningful variography. Otherwise, inverse distance squared was used. The estimated grades were then back-calculated by dividing estimated Au accumulation and estimated Sb accumulation by estimated true thickness.
For W, E, and N-lode, the December 31, 2012, resources, originally reported at a 4.7 g/t Au Eq. cut-off grade, were not re-estimated for more recent drill results but were restated for the 3.6 g/t Au Eq. cutoff grade used in the PEA. In addition, they were depleted for production through April 30, 2013.
The run of mine stockpile on April 30, 2013, was included in the Mineral Resource estimate. The volume of the stockpile was based on survey information. Stockpile grades were averaged from face samples that were sampled from the areas of the mine that contributed to the stockpile.
Preliminary Economic Analysis
The mine incorporating the Augusta lodes and Cuffley lode is an underground Sb-Au mine currently producing approximately 100,000 t per year ("t/y") of mill feed from a variety of mining methods to a depth of over 310 m below surface. The peak trucking rate to achieve the production schedule proposed is 108,000 t/y and this has been determined to be well within the capability of the current trucking fleet. The mine is serviced by a decline haulage system developed with dimensions of 4.8 m high by 4.5 m wide at a gradient of 1:7 down. The mine employs predominantly air-leg, longhole stoping methods as well as longitudinal uphole retreat working a bottom-up sequence. These mining methods have been utilized throughout 2010, 2011, and 2012. Cemented rock fill ("CRF") is placed into stoping voids to maximize extraction and assist with mine stability.
Mandalay expects to develop the Cuffley lode, the southern Inferred Resource boundary of which is located approximately 250 m to the northwest of the Augusta mine. Access to the Cuffley lode will be via single decline that will connect to the existing Augusta decline at the 1030 m level. The Cuffley lode is anticipated to produce, in conjunction with the Augusta Mine, at a maximum rate of 108,000 t/y. Three different mining methods-- full face development, longhole air-leg CRF stoping and half upper air-leg stoping will be utilized. All mined material will be transported to surface via the existing Augusta decline before being hauled to either the Brunswick run of mine pad or Augusta waste rock storage facility. The mining operation will continue to utilize proven methods and equipment that have been in use at the operation for the past four years.
Mining in the Cuffley lode will follow a bottom-up sequence, mining from the northern and southern extents retreating toward the central access. This sequence enables a consistent production profile to be maintained as it allows for dual development headings on each level. The current Augusta mining methods and extraction sequence are indicative of the development and stoping sequence planned at Cuffley.
Mill feed will be trucked to the Brunswick plant and processed using the same methods as used for the past four years on material from the Augusta mine. Metallurgical studies performed on Cuffley material suggest that the same costs and recoveries experienced on mill feed from Augusta will occur.
The key project criteria and assumptions used in preparation of the cash flow analysis have been listed in Table 6.
Table 6: Cuffley LOM criteria and assumptions
Description | Units | Quantity |
Proposed Mill Feed | Tonnes | 509,000 |
Gold grade (g/t) | 10.5 | |
Antimony grade (%) | 3.8 | |
Project Life | Months | 47 |
Average Production Rate | t/mth | 10,800 |
Maximum Mining Rate | t/mth | 13,000 |
Metallurgical Recovery | Gold (%) | 89 |
Antimony (%) | 96 | |
Gravity Gold | (%) | 34 |
Concentrate Grade | Gold (g/t) | 71 |
Antimony (%) | 53 | |
Concentrate Selling Expenses | $AUD/dmt | 195 |
Payable | Gold in Concentrate (%) | 78.5 |
Gravity Gold (%) | 98 | |
Antimony in Concentrate (%) | 63 | |
Exchange Rate | USD:$AUD | 0.90 |
Commodity Prices | Gold USD/oz | 1,300 |
Antimony USD/t | 9,500 |
A summary of the project economics are presented in Table 7. The NPV shown in Table 7 is calculated after tax. The after tax estimate is based on a Company tax rate of 30%, straight line depreciation, an opening book value of AUD$43 million and $AUD42 million of tax losses carried forward.
Table 7: PEA outcomes
Description | Units | Quantity | Units | Quantity |
Tonnes Milled | Tonnes | 509,000 | Tonnes | 509,000 |
Recovered Gold | Ounces | 152,000 | Ounces | 152,000 |
Recovered Antimony | Tonnes | 18,000 | Tonnes | 18,000 |
Operating Cost | $AUD M | 182 | USD M | 164 |
Operating Cost per Payable Ounce | $AUD/ Oz eq | 851 | USD/ pay Oz eq | 766 |
Capital Cost | $AUD M | 31 | USD M | 28 |
Total Operating + Capital Cost | $AUD M | 213 | USD M | 192 |
Total Cost per Payable Ounce | $AUD/ Oz eq | 998 | USD/ pay Oz eq | 898 |
Payable Gold | Ounces | 129,000 | Ounces | 129,000 |
Payable Antimony | Tonnes | 12,000 | Tonnes | 12,000 |
Payable (Saleable) Metal - Au Eq. | Oz Au Eq. 1 | 214,000 | Oz eq 1 | 214,000 |
Net Revenue (less selling expenses) | $AUD M | 299 | USD M | 269 |
After Tax Profit | $AUD M | 84 | USD M | 76 |
After Tax NPV5 | $AUD M | 74 | USD M | 67 |
IRR | % | 3309 | % | 3309 |
Max Negative Cash flow | $AUD M | -2 | USD M | -2 |
Max Negative Cash flow | Mth | Mar 2014 | Mth | Mar 2014 |
1 Oz eq - Gold Ounces + 9,500/1,300 * Antimony tonnes
Tonnes and ounces rounded to nearest thousand.
Million dollars rounded to nearest million.
Qualified Persons
Chris Gregory, General Manager of Australasian Corporate Development and Exploration for Mandalay Resources, a Member of Australian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG) and a Qualified Person as defined in NI 43-101, supervised the scientific and technical information relating to exploration reported here and has reviewed and approved such information contained in this press release.
Dr. Andrew Fowler, a Senior Geologist with AMC Consultants Pty; a BSc and PhD geologist, and MAIG and MAusIMM CP (Geo), and a Qualified Person as defined in NI 43-101, supervised and reviewed the resource estimation reported here and has reviewed and approved the resource information contained in this press release.
Peter Fairfield, Principal Consultant with SRK Consulting; BEng (Mining), FAusIMM (No: 106754), and a Qualified Person as defined in NI 43-101, compiled the PEA and has reviewed and approved the mine planning and financial analysis information contained in this press release.
About Mandalay Resources Corporation:
Mandalay Resources is a Canadian-based natural resource company with producing assets in Australia and producing and exploration projects in Chile. The Company is focused on executing a roll-up strategy, creating critical mass by aggregating advanced or in-production gold, copper, silver and antimony projects in Australia and the Americas to generate near-term cash flow and shareholder value.
Forward-Looking Statements:
This news release contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of applicable securities laws, including statements regarding the Company's Mineral Resources, Mineral Reserves, anticipated production from the Cuffley lode, anticipated exploration results at the Costerfield mine and the Costerfield Life of Mine plan. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Actual results and developments may differ materially from those contemplated by these statements depending on, among other things, changes in commodity prices and general market and economic conditions. The factors identified above are not intended to represent a complete list of the factors that could affect Mandalay. A description of additional risks that could result in actual results and developments differing from those contemplated by forward-looking statements in this news release can be found under the heading "Risk Factors" in Mandalay's annual information form dated March 27, 2013, a copy of which is available under Mandalay's profile at www.sedar.com. In addition, there can be no assurance that any current or future Inferred Resources that are discovered as a result of additional drilling will ever be upgraded to Proven or Probable Reserves. Although Mandalay has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
PDF available at: http://stream1.newswire.ca/media/2013/09/10/20130910_C5623_DOC_EN_30572.pdf
PDF available at: http://stream1.newswire.ca/media/2013/09/10/20130910_C5623_DOC_EN_30573.pdf
PDF available at: http://stream1.newswire.ca/media/2013/09/10/20130910_C5623_DOC_EN_30574.pdf
SOURCE: Mandalay Resources Corporation
Share this article