WESTLAKE VILLAGE, Calif., July 13, 2011 /PRNewswire/ -- Although residential electric utility customers are less satisfied with power quality, reliability and price than in 2010, improvements in operational-related aspects have largely mitigated the negative effects on overall satisfaction, according to the J.D. Power and Associates 2011 Electric Utility Residential Customer Satisfaction Study(SM) released today.
(Logo: http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20050527/LAF028LOGO-a)
The study measures customer satisfaction with electric utility companies by examining six key factors: power quality and reliability; price; billing and payment; corporate citizenship; communications; and customer service.
Residential customer satisfaction with electric utility companies averages 628 on a 1,000-point scale in 2011—a slight decrease from 630 in 2010. The two most important factors contributing to satisfaction, power quality and reliability and price, have declined from 2010 by five and eight points, respectively.
However, satisfaction with other factors has been steadily increasing. In particular, the communications and corporate citizenship factors have achieved the greatest gains in 2011, each improving by six points from 2010. These areas have also improved significantly between 2009 and 2011—increasing by 21 and 16 points, respectively.
"Operational improvements have helped electric utilities counterbalance the negative effects of weather and economic storms on overall satisfaction," said Chris Oberle, senior director of the energy and utility practice at J.D. Power and Associates. "In particular, utilities have made great strides in improving their customer communications and their billing and payment processes, both of which are crucial to elevating satisfaction."
The study ranks large and midsize utility companies in four geographic regions: East, Midwest, South and West. Companies in the midsize utility segments serve between 125,000 and 499,999 residential customers, while companies in the large utility segment serve 500,000 or more residential customers.
East Region
Among large utilities in the East region, Central Maine Power ranks highest for a fourth consecutive year. Following in the segment rankings are PPL Electric Utilities and New York State Electric & Gas, respectively.
In the East region midsize utility segment, Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative ranks highest for a fourth consecutive year, followed by Penn Power and Central Vermont Public Service, respectively.
Midwest Region
MidAmerican Energy ranks highest among large utility companies in the Midwest region for a fourth consecutive year. Xcel Energy—Midwest follows MidAmerican Energy, while KCP&L ranks third in the segment.
Omaha Public Power District ranks highest among midsize utility companies in the Midwest region for a fourth consecutive year and receives an award in the study for an 11th consecutive year. Following Omaha Public Power District in the segment are Indianapolis Power & Light Company and Kentucky Utilities, respectively.
South Region
Oklahoma Gas and Electric ranks highest among large utility companies in the South region. Following Oklahoma Gas and Electric in the rankings are CPS Energy and Progress Energy Carolinas, respectively.
Jackson EMC ranks highest among midsize utility companies in the South region for a second consecutive year, followed by Santee Cooper and NOVEC, respectively.
West Region
Salt River Project ranks highest among large utility companies in the West region for a fourth consecutive year and receives an award in the study for a 10th consecutive year. Following Salt River Project in the segment rankings are Sacramento Municipal Utility District and Portland General Electric, respectively.
Clark Public Utilities ranks highest among midsize utility companies in the West region for a fourth consecutive year, followed by Snohomish County PUD and Colorado Springs Utilities, respectively.
Additional Study Findings
The study also includes the following key findings about the attitudes of electric residential utility customers toward nuclear energy:
- More than one-half of customers (57%) indicate they support building nuclear power plants in the U.S. This percentage is even higher among customers who say they are aware of the recent nuclear crisis in Japan, with 60 percent of these customers supporting building nuclear power plants domestically.
- Support of nuclear power is high—averaging nearly 70 percent—among customers who indicate a nuclear power plant is located in or close to their community (within a 50-mile radius).
- Three-fourths of customers say that lowering the country's dependence on foreign oil is the primary benefit of nuclear power.
The 2011 Electric Utility Residential Customer Satisfaction Study is based on responses from more than 98,000 online interviews conducted from July 2010 through May 2011 among residential customers of the 124 largest electric utility brands across the United States, which collectively represent more than 93 million households.
Customer Satisfaction Index Ranking
(Based on a 1,000-point scale)
East Region: Large Segment |
||
Central Maine Power |
638 |
|
PPL Electric Utilities |
636 |
|
New York State Electric & Gas |
621 |
|
Penelec |
618 |
|
NSTAR |
617 |
|
PECO |
617 |
|
Allegheny Power |
614 |
|
Baltimore Gas and Electric |
611 |
|
Con Edison Company of New York |
610 |
|
Public Service Electric and Gas |
607 |
|
East Large Segment Average |
606 |
|
Jersey Central Power & Light |
603 |
|
National Grid |
602 |
|
Duquesne Light |
595 |
|
Connecticut Light & Power |
588 |
|
Long Island Power Authority |
582 |
|
Appalachian Power |
570 |
|
Pepco |
556 |
|
East Region: Midsize Segment |
||
Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative |
686 |
|
Penn Power |
636 |
|
Central Vermont Public Service |
623 |
|
Rochester Gas and Electric |
620 |
|
Western Massachusetts Electric |
617 |
|
Met-Ed |
615 |
|
East Midsize Segment Average |
608 |
|
Public Service of New Hampshire |
605 |
|
Delmarva Power |
604 |
|
Atlantic City Electric |
594 |
|
Central Hudson Gas & Electric |
593 |
|
Orange & Rockland |
587 |
|
United Illuminating |
586 |
|
Midwest Region: Large Segment |
||
MidAmerican Energy |
679 |
|
Xcel Energy—Midwest |
651 |
|
KCP&L |
644 |
|
We Energies |
642 |
|
Alliant Energy |
640 |
|
Indiana Michigan Power |
638 |
|
Westar Energy |
638 |
|
Ohio Edison |
632 |
|
Detroit Edison |
630 |
|
Midwest Large Segment Average |
621 |
|
Duke Energy—Midwest |
620 |
|
AEP Ohio |
615 |
|
Consumers Energy |
614 |
|
Ameren Missouri |
611 |
|
Ameren Illinois |
598 |
|
ComEd |
590 |
|
The Illuminating Company |
586 |
|
Midwest Region: Midsize Segment |
||
Omaha Public Power District |
685 |
|
Indianapolis Power & Light Company |
650 |
|
Kentucky Utilities |
649 |
|
Louisville Gas & Electric |
645 |
|
Wisconsin Public Service |
640 |
|
Midwest Midsize Segment Average |
627 |
|
Dayton Power & Light |
609 |
|
Toledo Edison |
604 |
|
Vectren |
596 |
|
Empire District Electric |
587 |
|
NIPSCO |
585 |
|
Kentucky Power |
574 |
|
South Region: Large Segment |
||
Oklahoma Gas and Electric |
669 |
|
CPS Energy |
667 |
|
Progress Energy Carolinas |
654 |
|
FPL |
652 |
|
Alabama Power |
649 |
|
Duke Energy—Carolinas |
646 |
|
Dominion Virginia Power |
644 |
|
South Large Segment Average |
643 |
|
South Carolina Electric & Gas |
641 |
|
Entergy Louisiana |
636 |
|
Entergy Arkansas |
634 |
|
Georgia Power |
634 |
|
Tampa Electric |
617 |
|
Progress Energy Florida |
612 |
|
South Region: Midsize Segment |
||
Jackson EMC |
711 |
|
Santee Cooper |
704 |
|
NOVEC |
699 |
|
Sawnee EMC |
690 |
|
CoServ |
680 |
|
SECO Energy |
674 |
|
EPB |
669 |
|
Xcel Energy—South |
665 |
|
Clay Electric Cooperative |
661 |
|
Mississippi Power |
661 |
|
Huntsville Utilities |
659 |
|
Entergy Mississippi |
654 |
|
Middle Tennessee EMC |
652 |
|
Entergy Texas |
649 |
|
Cobb EMC |
647 |
|
Pedernales Electric Cooperative |
645 |
|
Gulf Power |
642 |
|
South Midsize Segment Average |
641 |
|
Austin Energy |
640 |
|
Withlacoochee River Electric Cooperative |
638 |
|
Public Service Co. of Oklahoma |
635 |
|
Cleco Power |
631 |
|
Southwestern Electric Power |
630 |
|
Orlando Utilities Commission |
629 |
|
Lee County Electric Cooperative |
625 |
|
Rappahannock Electric Cooperative |
621 |
|
Nashville Electric Service |
615 |
|
Knoxville Utilities Board |
612 |
|
Memphis Light, Gas and Water |
595 |
|
JEA |
586 |
|
Entergy New Orleans |
569 |
|
West Region: Large Segment |
||
Salt River Project |
707 |
|
Sacramento Municipal Utility District |
682 |
|
Portland General Electric |
678 |
|
Rocky Mountain Power |
675 |
|
APS |
669 |
|
Pacific Power |
665 |
|
Southern California Edison |
650 |
|
West Large Segment Average |
640 |
|
Puget Sound Energy |
637 |
|
San Diego Gas & Electric |
637 |
|
Xcel Energy—West |
617 |
|
NV Energy |
616 |
|
Pacific Gas and Electric |
615 |
|
LADWP |
600 |
|
West Region: Midsize Segment |
||
Clark Public Utilities |
712 |
|
Snohomish County PUD |
676 |
|
Colorado Springs Utilities |
672 |
|
Idaho Power |
668 |
|
Tacoma Power |
665 |
|
Seattle City Light |
664 |
|
West Midsize Segment Average |
651 |
|
Tucson Electric Power |
644 |
|
Intermountain Rural Electric Association |
642 |
|
Avista |
640 |
|
NorthWestern Energy |
635 |
|
El Paso Electric |
626 |
|
PNM |
615 |
|
About J.D. Power and Associates
Headquartered in Westlake Village, Calif., J.D. Power and Associates is a global marketing information services company operating in key business sectors including market research, forecasting, performance improvement, Web intelligence and customer satisfaction. The company's quality and satisfaction measurements are based on responses from millions of consumers annually. For more information on car reviews and ratings, car insurance, health insurance, cell phone ratings, and more, please visit JDPower.com. J.D. Power and Associates is a business unit of The McGraw-Hill Companies.
About The McGraw-Hill Companies
Founded in 1888, The McGraw-Hill Companies is a leading global financial information and education company that helps professionals and students succeed in the Knowledge Economy. With leading brands including Standard & Poor's, McGraw-Hill Education, Platts energy information services and J.D. Power and Associates, the Corporation has approximately 21,000 employees with more than 280 offices in 40 countries. Sales in 2010 were $6.2 billion. Additional information is available at http://www.mcgraw-hill.com.
Media Relations Contacts:
Jeff Perlman; Brandware Public Relations; Malibu, Calif.; (818) 317-3070; [email protected]
Syvetril Perryman; J.D. Power and Associates; Westlake Village, Calif.; (805) 418-8103; [email protected]
No advertising or other promotional use can be made of the information in this release without the express prior written consent of J.D. Power and Associates. www.jdpower.com/corporate
SOURCE J.D. Power and Associates
WANT YOUR COMPANY'S NEWS FEATURED ON PRNEWSWIRE.COM?
Newsrooms &
Influencers
Digital Media
Outlets
Journalists
Opted In
Share this article