E Source Announces Top Electric and Gas Company IVRs
Study Finds 65% of Utilities Are Providing Better Customer Experience
BOULDER, Colo., July 19, 2011 /PRNewswire/ -- Consumers are enjoying a better experience when calling their electric and gas companies' interactive voice response systems (IVRs) compared to previous years, according to the "E Source Review of North American Electric and Gas Company IVRs: 2011." E Source found that 65 percent of the electric and gas companies reviewed improved the usability of their IVRs. In addition, none of the utility IVRs reviewed in 2011 are considered to be "very poor," unlike some of the IVRs reviewed in 2009.
The top-rated electric and gas company IVRs belong to Duke Energy, Portland General Electric, Florida Power & Light Co., NorthWestern Energy, Arizona Public Service, and Cleco. The top-rated Canadian utility IVR belongs to Union Gas Limited.
"The top-rated utilities have done a great job designing their IVRs with their customers in mind," says Rich Goodwin, manager of the E Source Utility Customer Care Service. "It's obvious that they are focused on making it easy for callers to complete their transactions."
E Source's comprehensive benchmark study, which has been conducted biannually since 2004, measures the performance of North American electric and gas company IVRs in meeting the needs of residential consumers. This year, 96 U.S. and Canadian IVRs were reviewed from the residential consumer's perspective, with a focus on how well they functioned for the key tasks that consumers expect to find on electric and gas company IVRs. The reviewers judged how usable they are — or how user-friendly it was to accomplish the tasks.
Florence Connally, associate research director at E Source, says, "Providing a better experience with the IVR will lead to a better interaction with the customer service representative as well as encourage customers to take the next step and make use of self-service options available on the IVR."
For the first time, reviews were also conducted using mobile phones. Two tasks, Make a Payment and Report an Outage or Emergency, were reviewed solely from mobile phones. "As more consumers rely on their mobile phones or live in mobile-only households, the experience of navigating a company's IVR from a mobile phone cannot be ignored," says Sarah Fiebiger, senior research associate at E Source.
Northeastern U.S.
Allegheny Power, Duquesne Light, and Baltimore Gas and Electric had the top-performing IVRs in this region.
Midwestern U.S.
The top three IVRs in this region belong to DTE Energy, KCP&L, and OG&E.
Southern U.S.
Duke Energy, Florida Power & Light Co., and Cleco were named as the top utility IVRs in the southern region.
West U.S.
Portland General Electric, NorthWestern Energy, and Arizona Public Service have the top three IVRs in this region.
Canada
The top-performing IVRs in Canada belong to Union Gas Limited, Toronto Hydro Electric System, and Hydro One.
The "E Source Review of North American Electric and Gas Company IVRs: 2011" is based on the reviews of more than 1,200 calls to utility IVRs. These reviews were conducted between December 2010 and March 2011 by four typical residential energy customers who called 96 U.S. and Canadian utilities to see if 13 key residential customer service tasks could be found using their IVRs. The 13 tasks fell into three categories: general customer service, payment, and credit. The number of tasks found determined the functionality score of each IVR, and E Source used that score, coupled with the usability rating for each IVR, to rank each utility on a 1,000-point scale.
About E Source
E Source has been providing unbiased, objective energy business intelligence to over 300 utilities and large corporate energy users for more than 20 years. We provide analysis, research, and tools that increase the effectiveness of our clients' operations, programs, and customer relationships. Our research analysts and consultants supply expertise in energy efficiency, utility customer satisfaction, program design, marketing, energy management, energy procurement, supply management, and carbon management.
NOTE: One chart follows.
2011 Performance Ranking of U.S. and Canadian IVRs
Functionality and average usability ratings for each of the 96 IVRs reviewed were equally weighted and combined to determine each IVR's overall performance index number, with a maximum possible value of 1,000. The IVRs were then ranked in descending order by performance index number. First-quartile utilities have both above-average usability and more than 50 percent of the 13 tasks we looked for in this study.
Ranking |
Organization name |
Performance index |
|
Top quartile |
|||
1 |
Duke Energy |
809 |
|
2 |
Portland General Electric |
772 |
|
3 |
Florida Power & Light Co. |
763 |
|
3 |
NorthWestern Energy |
763 |
|
5 |
Arizona Public Service |
721 |
|
5 |
Cleco |
721 |
|
7 |
Union Gas Limited |
710 |
|
8 |
PacifiCorp |
707 |
|
9 |
DTE Energy |
693 |
|
10 |
Allegheny Power |
685 |
|
11 |
Sacramento Municipal Utility District |
679 |
|
12 |
Duquesne Light |
667 |
|
12 |
KCP&L |
667 |
|
14 |
NIPSCO |
644 |
|
15 |
Baltimore Gas and Electric |
638 |
|
16 |
Long Island Power Authority |
636 |
|
16 |
OG&E |
636 |
|
16 |
Wisconsin Public Service |
636 |
|
19 |
Pacific Gas and Electric Co. |
626 |
|
19 |
Philadelphia Gas Works |
626 |
|
19 |
Georgia Power |
626 |
|
22 |
Alliant Energy |
620 |
|
22 |
NW Natural |
620 |
|
22 |
PNM |
620 |
|
22 |
Vectren Corp. |
620 |
|
Ranking |
Organization name |
Performance index |
|
Second quartile |
|||
26 |
Columbia Gas of Ohio |
617 |
|
27 |
Laclede Gas |
610 |
|
27 |
Peoples Gas |
610 |
|
29 |
Dayton Power & Light |
609 |
|
29 |
We Energies |
609 |
|
29 |
Xcel Energy |
609 |
|
32 |
Omaha Public Power District |
606 |
|
32 |
Puget Sound Energy |
606 |
|
32 |
Toronto Hydro-Electric System |
606 |
|
35 |
Centerpoint Energy |
605 |
|
35 |
Progress Energy Inc. |
605 |
|
37 |
MidAmerican Energy |
596 |
|
38 |
Ameren |
591 |
|
39 |
Connecticut Light & Power |
589 |
|
40 |
Hydro One |
585 |
|
41 |
NV Energy |
582 |
|
41 |
PECO |
582 |
|
43 |
American Electric Power |
573 |
|
44 |
Austin Energy |
573 |
|
44 |
Louisville Gas and Electric Co. |
573 |
|
44 |
National Grid |
573 |
|
44 |
Oklahoma Natural Gas |
573 |
|
48 |
Idaho Power Co. |
567 |
|
Ranking |
Organization name |
Performance index |
|
Third quartile |
|||
49 |
Consumers Energy |
564 |
|
50 |
SRP (Salt River Project) |
560 |
|
51 |
CPS Energy |
558 |
|
51 |
Jersey Central Power & Light |
558 |
|
51 |
Public Service Electric & Gas |
558 |
|
51 |
South Carolina Electric & Gas (SCANA) |
558 |
|
51 |
Southern California Edison |
558 |
|
51 |
Washington Gas |
558 |
|
57 |
NSTAR |
555 |
|
58 |
Pepco |
554 |
|
58 |
Southwest Gas Corp. |
555 |
|
60 |
Manitoba Hydro |
543 |
|
60 |
Nova Scotia Power |
543 |
|
60 |
Southern California Gas Co. |
543 |
|
63 |
TECO Peoples Gas |
537 |
|
64 |
Hawaiian Electric Co. |
529 |
|
64 |
Piedmont Natural Gas |
529 |
|
66 |
Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division |
527 |
|
67 |
Hydro Ottawa |
522 |
|
68 |
Tacoma Public Utilities |
519 |
|
69 |
Westar Energy |
517 |
|
70 |
ComEd |
502 |
|
70 |
Enbridge Gas |
502 |
|
72 |
Dominion |
501 |
|
72 |
Entergy Corp. |
501 |
|
72 |
NB Power |
501 |
|
72 |
PPL Electric Utilities |
501 |
|
72 |
Silicon Valley Power |
501 |
|
Ranking |
Organization name |
Performance index |
|
Fourth quartile |
|||
77 |
Consolidated Edison Co. of New York (Con Edison) |
481 |
|
78 |
Black Hills Energy |
467 |
|
78 |
Tucson Electric Power |
467 |
|
80 |
Atmos Energy |
466 |
|
80 |
San Diego Gas & Electric |
466 |
|
82 |
BC Hydro |
466 |
|
83 |
Nicor Gas |
449 |
|
83 |
Questar Gas |
449 |
|
85 |
Missouri Gas Energy |
448 |
|
86 |
EPCOR |
439 |
|
87 |
Reliant Energy |
435 |
|
88 |
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power |
417 |
|
89 |
New York State Electric & Gas |
407 |
|
90 |
Santee Cooper |
392 |
|
90 |
TXU Energy |
392 |
|
92 |
FortisBC (reviewed as Terasen Gas) |
373 |
|
93 |
Hydro-Quebec |
365 |
|
94 |
ENMAX |
342 |
|
95 |
Avista Utilities |
324 |
|
96 |
Direct Energy |
282 |
|
SOURCE E Source
WANT YOUR COMPANY'S NEWS FEATURED ON PRNEWSWIRE.COM?
Newsrooms &
Influencers
Digital Media
Outlets
Journalists
Opted In
Share this article