Discovery Institute Says National Activists Spreading False Facts About South Dakota Science Education Bill SB 55

PIERRE, S.D., Feb. 15, 2017 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Dogmatic national activists are trying to derail proposed science education language in South Dakota aimed at supporting critical thinking by allowing students to learn how scientists debate scientific issues, according to John West, Vice President at Discovery Institute's Center for Science & Culture. 

South Dakota legislators are currently considering SB 55, "An Act to protect the teaching of certain scientific information." Since the bill was introduced, Darwin-only lobbyists at Americans United for Separation of Church and State have been attacking SB 55 and circulating misinformation about it, such as the false claim that SB 55 would authorize the teaching of "intelligent design."

"Americans United is so worried about what's between the words of the bill, they aren't paying attention to what the words in the bill actually say," said John West Vice President at Discovery Institute in reference to latest blog post from Americans United.

"Contrary to what Americans United says, SB 55 explicitly limits authorization to 'scientific information presented in courses being taught which are aligned with the content standards,'" said Sarah Chaffee, Program Officer in Public Policy and Education at Discovery Institute in reference to latest blog post from Americans United.

Chaffee points out that South Dakota's current science content standards do not include intelligent design, and thus the bill does not protect the teaching of intelligent design (which is different from creationism). The bill only pertains to topics already in the standards.

"The academic freedom bill does not require teachers to teach anything differently," said Chaffee. "Scientific topics will still be taught as required by state law. But it also gives teachers academic freedom to choose to teach about both 'the strengths and weaknesses of scientific information' in the standards - such as evidence for and against the neo-Darwinian 'consensus.'"

SOURCE Discovery Institute

Related Links

http://www.discovery.org