CP reports Q2 2015 diluted earnings per share of C$2.36; adjusted EPS of $2.45

Revises full-year 2015 earnings outlook

CALGARY, July 21, 2015 /PRNewswire/ - Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (TSX: CP) (NYSE: CP) today announced the highest-ever net income for the second quarter and the lowest operating ratio for the period in the company's history.

Net income rose to a record quarterly high of $390 million, or $2.36 per diluted share, an improvement of 12 percent. Adjusted earnings per share gained 16 percent to $2.45. Revenues were little changed at $1.65 billion.

"CP remains disciplined during this period of economic uncertainty in identifying opportunities to control costs and improve efficiency to offset near-term headwinds," said E. Hunter Harrison, CP's Chief Executive Officer. "CP's achievement on the bottom line came even as a sluggish North American recovery and stubborn global economic softness weighed on commodity prices, forcing producers to reduce output and cut shipments."

SECOND-QUARTER 2015 HIGHLIGHTS

• Operating income climbed 10 percent to $646 million
• OR fell to a second-quarter record 60.9 percent, a 420-basis-point improvement
• Adjusted earnings per share advanced 16 percent to $2.45

"Even in the face of this economic slowdown, CP's commitment to providing the best service at the lowest cost will continue to serve us well moving forward," Harrison said. "The positive CP story is based on a business model that allows for flexibility - we are nimble, efficient, and able to respond to the ever-changing economic climate."

UPDATED FINANCIAL EXPECTATIONS FOR 2015

The company expects revenue growth to be 2-3 percent, operating ratio to be below 62 percent, and 2015 annual adjusted diluted EPS of $10.00 to $10.40.

Key assumptions for the updated full year 2015 financial expectations include:

• Canadian to U.S. dollar average exchange rate of $1.25
• An effective income tax rate (excluding discrete items) of 27.5 percent
• Defined benefit pension expense of approximately $35 million, compared with 2014 pension income of $52 million
• Capital expenditures of approximately $1.5 billion
• Average On Highway Diesel ("OHD") price of U.S. $2.80-$2.90
• Current share repurchase plan expected to be completed by calendar year-end

Further, CP will no longer be exempt from the regular SEC reporting requirements in 2016 because a majority of its board was comprised of U.S. citizens or residents as of June 30, 2015 (the relevant date for determining foreign private issuer status for U.S. SEC reporting purposes in 2016). This follows a determination that the resignation of Stephen Tobias from the board occurred on July 3, 2015.

Accordingly, CP plans to follow the regular SEC reporting requirements effective January 1, 2016, file an annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 and file regular periodic reports under both Canadian and U.S. law thereafter.

Non-GAAP Measures
For further information regarding non-GAAP measures, including reconciliations to the nearest GAAP measures, see the attached supplementary schedule Non-GAAP Measures.

Note on forward-looking information
This news release contains certain forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities laws relating, but not limited, to our operations, priorities and plans, anticipated financial performance, including our 2015 full-year guidance, business prospects, planned capital expenditures, programs and strategies. This forward-looking information also includes, but is not limited to, statements concerning expectations, beliefs, plans, goals, objectives, assumptions and statements about possible future events, conditions, and results of operations or performance. Forward-looking information may contain statements with words or headings such as "financial expectations", "key assumptions", "anticipate", "believe", "expect", "plan", "will", "outlook", "should" or similar words suggesting future outcomes. To the extent that CP has provided guidance using non-GAAP financial measures, the Company may not be able to provide a reconciliation to a GAAP measure, due to unknown variables and uncertainty related to future results.

Undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking information as actual results may differ materially from the forward-looking information. Forward-looking information is not a guarantee of future performance. By its nature, CP's forward-looking information involves numerous assumptions, inherent risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking information, including but not limited to the following factors: the key assumptions identified above; changes in business strategies; general North American and global economic, credit and business conditions; risks in agricultural production such as weather conditions and insect populations; the availability and price of energy commodities; the effects of competition and pricing pressures; industry capacity; shifts in market demand; changes in commodity prices; uncertainty surrounding timing and volumes of commodities being shipped via CP; inflation; changes in laws and regulations, including regulation of rates; changes in taxes and tax rates; potential increases in maintenance and operating costs; uncertainties of investigations, proceedings or other types of claims and litigation; labour disputes; risks and liabilities arising from derailments; transportation of dangerous goods; timing of completion of capital and maintenance projects; currency and interest rate fluctuations; effects of changes in market conditions and discount rates on the financial position of pension plans and investments; and various events that could disrupt operations, including severe weather, droughts, floods, avalanches and earthquakes as well as security threats and governmental response to them, and technological changes. The foregoing list of factors is not exhaustive.

These and other factors are detailed from time to time in reports filed by CP with securities regulators in Canada and the United States. Reference should be made to "Management's Discussion and Analysis" in CP's annual and interim reports, Annual Information Form and Form 40-F. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking information. Forward-looking information is based on current expectations, estimates and projections and it is possible that predictions, forecasts, projections, and other forms of forward-looking information will not be achieved by CP. Except as required by law, CP undertakes no obligation to update publicly or otherwise revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

About Canadian Pacific
Canadian Pacific (TSX:CP)(NYSE:CP) is a transcontinental railway in Canada and the United States with direct links to eight major ports, including Vancouver and Montreal, providing North American customers a competitive rail service with access to key markets in every corner of the globe. CP is growing with its customers, offering a suite of freight transportation services, logistics solutions and supply chain expertise. Visit cpr.ca to see the rail advantages of Canadian Pacific.

INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME 
(in millions of Canadian dollars, except per share data)
(unaudited)

INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in millions of Canadian dollars)
(unaudited)

INTERIM CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS AT,
(in millions of Canadian dollars)
(unaudited)

INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in millions of Canadian dollars)
(unaudited)

INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(in millions of Canadian dollars, except common share amounts)
(unaudited)

NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2015
(unaudited)

1 Basis of presentation
 
These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of Canadian Pacific Railway Limited ("CP", or "the Company"), expressed in Canadian dollars, reflect management's estimates and assumptions that are necessary for their fair presentation in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"). They do not include all disclosures required under GAAP for annual financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the 2014 annual consolidated financial statements. The accounting policies used are consistent with the accounting policies used in preparing the 2014 annual consolidated financial statements, except for the accounting change discussed in Note 2.
 
CP's operations can be affected by seasonal fluctuations such as changes in customer demand and weather-related issues. This seasonality could impact quarter-over-quarter comparisons.
 
In management's opinion, the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (consisting of normal and recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly such information. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the fiscal year.
 
2  Accounting changes
 
Implemented in 2015
 
Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs
 
In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs under FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 835. The amendments require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments. Early adoption of this ASU is permitted. The Company adopted the provisions of this ASU during the second quarter of 2015 and retrospectively adjusted the 2014 comparative periods to conform with current presentation.
 
Long-term debt issuance costs of $38 million have been presented as a reduction of the carrying value of "Long-term debt" as at June 30, 2015. The comparative period has been adjusted for the retrospective change in accounting principle with a reclassification of $34 million from "Other assets" against the carrying value of "Long-term debt" as at December 31, 2014. There was no impact on the income statement as a result of the adoption of the provisions of this ASU during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and comparative periods.

Future changes
 
Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis
 
In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis under FASB ASC Topic 810. The amendments require reporting entities to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities under the revised consolidation model. Specifically, the amendments modify the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are variable interest entities ("VIEs") or voting interest entities, eliminate the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership and affect the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with VIEs, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related party relationships. This ASU will be effective for public entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Entities have the option of using either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach to adopt this ASU. The Company is currently evaluating the impact on the consolidated financial statements the adoption of this ASU will have.
 
Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent)
 
In May 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-07, Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent) under FASB ASC Topic 820.  The amendments remove the requirement to categorize within the fair value hierarchy all investments for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share practical expedient and certain disclosures related to those investments.  This ASU will be effective for public entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015, and will be applied retrospectively.  The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material impact to the Company's financial statements.
 
3  Changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss ("AOCL") by component 
 

4 Gain on settlement of legal proceedings related to the purchase and sale of a building
 
In 2013, CP provided an interest free loan pursuant to a court order to a corporation owned by a court appointed trustee ("the judicial trustee") to facilitate the acquisition of a building. The building was held in trust during the legal proceedings with regard to CP's entitlement to an exercised purchase option of the building ("purchase option"). As at December 31, 2014, the loan of $20 million and the purchase option with a carrying value of $8 million, were recorded as "Other assets" in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets.
 
In the first quarter of 2015, CP reached a settlement with a third party that, following the sale of the building to an arm's length third party, resulted in resolution of legal proceedings. CP received $59 million for the sale of the building which included repayment of the aforementioned loan to the judicial trustee. A gain of $31 million ($27 million after tax) was recorded as a credit within "Operating expenses".
 
5 Other income and charges  

6  Income taxes

During the three months ended June 30, 2015, legislation was enacted to increase the Alberta provincial corporate income tax rate. As a result of this change, the Company recorded an income tax expense of $23 million in the quarter related to the revaluation of its deferred income tax balances as at January 1, 2015.

The estimated 2015 annualized effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, excluding discrete items (Foreign exchange loss on long-term debt included in "Other income and charges" and revaluation of deferred income tax balances as at January 1, 2015 due to the enacted Alberta provincial corporate income tax rate increase), is 27.5% (28.0% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014).

The effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, including discrete items, is 31.3% and 30.5%, respectively. 

The higher rates for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to the estimated 2015 annualized effective tax rate was the result of the income tax expense of $23 million in the second quarter related to the revaluation of deferred income tax balances as at January 1, 2015 due to the enacted Alberta provincial corporate income tax rate increase.

7  Earnings per share

At June 30, 2015, the number of shares outstanding was 161.3 million (June 30, 2014 - 172.8 million).

Basic earnings per share have been calculated using net income for the period divided by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the period.

The number of shares used in earnings per share calculations is reconciled as follows:

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, there were 175,068 options and 87,976 options, respectively, excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because their effects were not dilutive (three and six months ended June 30, 2014 - 124,093 and 120,930, respectively).

8  Assets held for sale

During the first quarter of 2015, the Company finalized a sales agreement with Norfolk Southern Corporation ("NS") for the portion of Delaware and Hudson Railway Company, Inc.'s line between Sunbury, Pennsylvania and Schenectady, New York. The assets expected to be sold to NS, for proceeds of approximately U.S. $215 million subject to closing adjustments, have been classified as "Assets held for sale" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014. The sale, which received approval by the U.S. Surface Transportation Board on May 15, 2015, is expected to close later in 2015.

9  Debt

Issuance of long-term debt

During the first quarter of 2015, the Company issued U.S. $700 million 2.900% 10-year notes due February 1, 2025 for net proceeds of U.S. $694 million (CDN $873 million).  These notes pay interest semi-annually and are unsecured but carry a negative pledge.  In addition, the Company settled a notional U.S. $700 million of forward starting floating-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements ("forward starting swaps") for a payment of U.S. $50 million (CDN $63 million) cash (see Note 11).  This payment was included in the same line item as the related hedged item on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.  Inclusive of the settlement of the forward starting swap, the annualized effective yield at issuance was 3.61%.

Commercial paper program

During the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company established a commercial paper program which enables it to issue commercial paper up to a maximum aggregate principal amount of U.S. $1 billion in the form of unsecured promissory notes.  The commercial paper is backed by a U.S. $1 billion committed, revolving credit facility, which matures on September 26, 2016.  As at June 30, 2015, the Company had total commercial paper borrowings of U.S. $500 million (CDN $625 million), presented in "Long-term debt" on the Interim Consolidated Balance Sheets (December 31, 2014 - U.S. $675 million (CDN $783 million)) as the Company has the intent and ability to renew these borrowings on a long term basis.  The weighted-average interest rate on these borrowings was 0.48% (December 31, 2014 - 0.44%).

The Company presents issuances and repayments of commercial paper in the Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows on a net basis, all of which have a maturity of less than 90 days.

Revolving credit facility

Effective June 15, 2015, CP amended its existing revolving credit facility agreement dated September 26, 2014.  The amended credit facility agreement requires the Company not to exceed a maximum debt to earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization ratio.  The original revolving credit facility agreement stipulated that the Company not exceed a maximum debt to capitalization ratio.  As at June 30, 2015, the Company satisfied the thresholds stipulated in both the existing and amended financial covenant.

10  Shareholders' Equity

On March 16, 2015, the Company announced the renewal of its Board of Directors approved normal course issuer bid ("bid" or "NCIB"), commencing March 18, 2015 to March 17, 2016, to purchase up to 9.14 million of its outstanding Common shares for cancellation.

All purchases are made in accordance with the bid at prevalent market prices plus brokerage fees, or such other prices that may be permitted by the Toronto Stock Exchange, with consideration allocated to share capital up to the average carrying amount of the shares, and any excess allocated to retained earnings. The following table provides the activities under the share repurchase program:

11  Financial instruments

A.  Fair values of financial instruments

The Company categorizes its financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value in line with the fair value hierarchy established by GAAP that prioritizes, with respect to reliability, the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. This hierarchy consists of three broad levels. Level 1 inputs consist of quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets and liabilities and give the highest priority to these inputs. Level 2 and 3 inputs are based on significant other observable inputs and significant unobservable inputs, respectively, and give lower priority to these inputs.

When possible, the estimated fair value is based on quoted market prices and, if not available, estimates from third party brokers. For non-exchange traded derivatives classified in Level 2, the Company uses standard valuation techniques to calculate fair value. Primary inputs to these techniques include observable market prices (interest, foreign exchange ("FX"), and commodity) and volatility, depending on the type of derivative and nature of the underlying risk. The Company applied inputs and data used by willing market participants when valuing derivatives and considers its own credit default swap spread, as well as those of its counterparties, in its determination of fair value.

The carrying values of financial instruments equal or approximate their fair values with the exception of long-term debt which has a fair value of approximately $7,669 million at June 30, 2015 (December 31, 2014 - $6,939 million) and a carrying value of $6,701 million at June 30, 2015 (December 31, 2014 - $5,759 million). The estimated fair value of current and long-term borrowings has been determined based on market information where available, or by discounting future payments of interest and principal at estimated interest rates expected to be available to the Company at period end. All derivatives and long-term debt are classified as Level 2.

B.   Financial risk management

Derivative financial instruments

Derivative financial instruments may be used to selectively reduce volatility associated with fluctuations in interest rates, FX rates, the price of fuel, and stock-based compensation expense. Where derivatives are designated as hedging instruments, the relationship between the hedging instruments and their associated hedged items is documented, as well as the risk management objective and strategy for the use of the hedging instruments. This documentation includes linking the derivatives that are designated as fair value or cash flow hedges to specific assets or liabilities on the Interim Consolidated Balance Sheets, commitments, or forecasted transactions. At the time a derivative contract is entered into and at least quarterly thereafter, an assessment is made whether the derivative item is effective in offsetting the changes in fair value or cash flows of the hedged items. The derivative qualifies for hedge accounting treatment if it is effective in substantially mitigating the risk it was designed to address.

It is not the Company's intent to use financial derivatives or commodity instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

Foreign exchange management

The Company conducts business transactions and owns assets in both Canada and the United States. As a result, the Company is exposed to fluctuations in value of financial commitments, assets, liabilities, income or cash flows due to changes in FX rates. The Company may enter into FX risk management transactions primarily to manage fluctuations in the exchange rate between Canadian and U.S. currencies. FX exposure is primarily mitigated through natural offsets created by revenues, expenditures and balance sheet positions incurred in the same currency. Where appropriate, the Company may negotiate with customers and suppliers to reduce the net exposure.

Net investment hedge

The FX gains and losses on long-term debt are mainly unrealized and can only be realized when U.S. dollar denominated long-term debt matures or is settled. The Company also has long-term FX exposure on its investment in U.S. affiliates. The majority of the Company's U.S. dollar denominated long-term debt has been designated as a hedge of the net investment in foreign subsidiaries. This designation has the effect of mitigating volatility on net income by offsetting long-term FX gains and losses on U.S. dollar denominated long-term debt and gains and losses on its net investment. The effective portion recognized in "Other comprehensive income" for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 was an unrealized FX gain of $58 million and an unrealized FX loss of $298 million, respectively (three and six months ended June 30, 2014 - unrealized FX gain of $119 million and loss of $12 million, respectively).  There was no ineffectiveness during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and comparative periods.

Interest rate management

The Company is exposed to interest rate risk, which is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will vary as a result of changes in market interest rates.  In order to manage funding needs or capital structure goals, the Company enters into debt or capital lease agreements that are subject to either fixed market interest rates set at the time of issue or floating rates determined by on-going market conditions.  Debt subject to variable interest rates exposes the Company to variability in interest expense, while debt subject to fixed interest rates exposes the Company to variability in the fair value of debt.

To manage interest rate exposure, the Company accesses diverse sources of financing and manages borrowings in line with a targeted range of capital structure, debt ratings, liquidity needs, maturity schedule, and currency and interest rate profiles.  In anticipation of future debt issuances, the Company may enter into forward rate agreements, that are designated as cash flow hedges, to substantially lock in all or a portion of the effective future interest expense.  The Company may also enter into swap agreements, designated as fair value hedges, to manage the mix of fixed and floating rate debt.

Forward starting swaps

During the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company entered into forward starting swaps totalling a notional U.S. $1.4 billion to fix the benchmark rate on cash flows associated with highly probable forecasted issuances of long-term notes.

During the first three months of 2015, the Company settled a notional U.S. $700 million of forward starting swaps related to the U.S. $700 million 2.900% 10-year notes issued in the same period.  Inclusive of the settlement of the forward starting swap, the annualized effective yield at issuance was 3.61%.  The fair value of these derivative instruments was a loss of U.S. $50 million (CDN $63 million) at the time of settlement.  The effective portion of changes in fair value on the forward starting swaps of U.S. $48 million (CDN $60 million), was recorded in "Accumulated other comprehensive loss", and is amortized to "Net interest expense" until the underlying notes, which were hedged, are repaid.  A loss of $1 million and $2 million related to these previously settled derivatives has been reclassified to "Net interest expense" for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively.  The Company expects during the next 12 months, $6 million of losses will be reclassified to "Net interest expense".  The ineffective portion of U.S. $2 million (CDN $2 million), was recorded immediately in income as "Net interest expense" during the first three months of 2015.

As at June 30, 2015 the unrealized loss of $22 million derived from the remaining forward starting swaps was included in "Accounts payable and accrued liabilities" with the offset reflected in "Other comprehensive income" on the Interim Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

As at December 31, 2014, the unrealized loss derived from the forward starting swaps was $46 million of which $21 million was included in "Accounts payable and accrued liabilities" and $25 million in "Other long-term liabilities" with the offset reflected in "Other comprehensive income" on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

Interest rate swaps

During the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company entered into floating-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements totalling U.S. $600 million to hedge the variability in cash flow associated with fluctuations in interest rates on commercial paper issuances.  As at June 30, 2015, floating-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements totalling U.S. $350 million are outstanding.  These swaps expire in 2015 and are accounted for as a cash flow hedge.  The effective portion of changes in fair value of the swaps is recorded in "Accumulated other comprehensive loss", net of tax.  Subsequent to the commercial paper issuance, the amounts recorded in "Accumulated other comprehensive loss" are reclassified to "Net interest expense".

A negligible realized gain was reclassified from "Accumulated other comprehensive loss" to "Net interest expense" related to settled derivatives in the three and six months ended June 30, 2015.

At June 30, 2015, a negligible unrealized loss from the outstanding derivatives was recorded in "Accounts payable and accrued liabilities" on the Interim Consolidated Balance Sheets with the offset reflected in "Other comprehensive income" on the Interim Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

At December 31, 2014, the unrealized gain recorded in "Other current assets" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets was not significant.  The offset was reflected in "Other comprehensive income" on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

12  Stock-based compensation

At June 30, 2015, the Company had several stock-based compensation plans, including stock option plans, various cash settled liability plans and an employee stock savings plan. These plans resulted in a recovery of $5 million and expense of $24 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively (three and six months ended June 30, 2014 an expense of $39 million and $61 million, respectively).

Regular options
In the six months ended June 30, 2015, under CP's stock option plans, the Company issued 315,724 regular options at the weighted-average price of $218.93 per share, based on the closing price on the grant date.

Pursuant to the employee plans, these regular options may be exercised upon vesting, which is between 12 and 48 months after the grant date, and will expire after 10 years.

Under the fair value method, the fair value of the regular options at the grant date was $16 million. The weighted-average fair value assumptions were approximately:

Performance share unit ("PSU") plan
In the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company issued 137,222 PSUs with a grant date fair value of approximately $29 million. These units attract dividend equivalents in the form of additional units based on the dividends paid on the Company's Common Shares. PSUs vest and are settled in cash, or in CP common shares approximately three years after the grant date, contingent upon CP's performance ("performance factor"). The fair value of PSUs is measured, both on the grant date and each subsequent quarter until settlement, using a Monte Carlo simulation model. The model utilizes multiple input variables that determine the probability of satisfying the performance factor and market conditions stipulated in the grant.

Deferred share unit ("DSU") plan
In the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company granted 15,652 DSUs with a grant date fair value of approximately $3 million. DSUs vest over various periods of up to 48 months and are only redeemable for a specified period after employment is terminated. An expense to income for DSUs is recognized over the vesting period for both the initial subscription price and the change in value between reporting periods.

13  Pensions and other benefits

In the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company made contributions of $20 million and $41 million, respectively (three and six months ended June 30, 2014 - $20 million and $39 million, respectively) to its defined benefit pension plans. The net periodic benefit cost for defined benefit pension plans and other benefits, including the recognition of an $11 million gain related to legacy pension plans, in the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 included the following components:

14  Contingencies

In the normal course of its operations, the Company becomes involved in various legal actions, including claims relating to injuries and damage to property. The Company maintains provisions it considers to be adequate for such actions. While the final outcome with respect to actions outstanding or pending at June 30, 2015 cannot be predicted with certainty, it is the opinion of management that their resolution will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

Legal proceedings related to Lac-Mégantic rail accident

On July 6, 2013, a train carrying crude oil operated by Montreal Maine and Atlantic Railway ("MM&A") derailed and exploded in Lac-Mégantic, Quebec on a section of railway line owned by MM&A.  The previous day CP had interchanged the train to MM&A, and after that interchange MM&A exercised exclusive control over the train.

Following this incident, the Minister of Sustainable Development, Environment, Wildlife and Parks of Quebec issued an order directing certain named parties to recover the contaminants and to clean up and decontaminate the derailment site.  CP was added as a named party on August 14, 2013.  CP is a party to an administrative appeal with respect to this order.  No hearing date on the merits of CP's appeal has been scheduled.

A class action lawsuit has also been filed in the Superior Court of Quebec on behalf of a class of persons and entities residing in, owning or leasing property in, operating a business in or physically present in Lac-Mégantic.  The lawsuit seeks damages caused by the derailment including for wrongful deaths, personal injuries, and property damages.  CP was added as a defendant on August 16, 2013.  On May 8, 2015, the Superior Court of Quebec authorized the institution of the Class Action as against CP and the shipper, Western Petroleum, and its parent, World Fuel Services.

In the wake of the derailment and ensuing litigation, MM&A filed for bankruptcy in Canada and the United States.  In an Adversary Proceeding filed by the MM&A U.S. bankruptcy trustee against CP, Irving Oil and the World Fuel entities, CP has been accused of failing to ensure that World Fuel or Irving Oil properly classified the oil lading and of not refusing to ship the oil in DOT-111 tank cars. In response to CP's motion to withdraw the bankruptcy court reference, the trustee maintained that Canadian law rather than U.S. law controlled, and the court found that if the federal regulations governed the case was not complex enough to warrant withdrawal.  Because the trustee maintained that conduct subject to Canadian regulation prevailed CP moved to dismiss for want of personal jurisdiction.  That motion will be heard on August 18, 2015.

On March 31, 2015, the Canadian Monitor in the MM&A bankruptcy filed a Plan of Arrangement under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act ("CCAA") whereby the Monitor sought court approval of the Plan. On July 13, 2015, the Quebec Superior court approved MM&A's Plan of arrangement. Subject to this judgement becoming a final judgement and subject to approval by the U.S. Court, the plan will provide for the distribution of a fund of approximately $430 million amongst those who claimed loss or damage as a result of the derailment and will release those parties which contributed to the fund for any further liability. Moreover, the Plan of arrangement provides for broadly worded third-party releases and channeling injunctions. CP has not contributed to the fund.

In addition, CP has received two damage to cargo notices of claims from the shipper of the oil on the derailed train, Western Petroleum.  Western Petroleum has submitted U.S. and Canadian notices of claims for the same damages and, under the Carmack Amendment (the U.S. damage to cargo statute), seeks to recover for all injuries associated with, and indemnification for all claims arising from, the derailment.  Both jurisdictions permit a shipper to recover the value of damaged lading against any carrier in the delivery chain, subject to limitations in the carrier's tariffs.  CP's tariffs significantly restrict shipper damage claim rights.  Western Fuels is part of the World Fuels group, and those entities recently settled with the trustee.  In connection with that settlement, Western Petroleum assigned all Carmack claims to the trustee.  So far the trustee has not pursued Carmack claims against CP, but both the World Fuels group and the trustee have maintained that Carmack liability extends beyond lading losses to cover all damages incurred by the World Fuels group or Irving Oil associated with the derailment.

At this early stage in the legal proceedings, any potential liability and the quantum of potential loss cannot be determined.  Nevertheless, CP denies liability for MM&A's derailment and will vigorously defend itself in the proceedings described above and in any proceeding that may be commenced in the future.

Environmental liabilities

Environmental remediation accruals, recorded on an undiscounted basis unless a reliably determinable estimate as to an amount and timing of costs can be established, cover site-specific remediation programs.

The accruals for environmental remediation represent CP's best estimate of its probable future obligation and include both asserted and unasserted claims, without reduction for anticipated recoveries from third parties. Although the recorded accruals include CP's best estimate of all probable costs, CP's total environmental remediation costs cannot be predicted with certainty. Accruals for environmental remediation may change from time to time as new information about previously untested sites becomes known, environmental laws and regulations evolve and advances are made in environmental remediation technology. The accruals may also vary as the courts decide legal proceedings against outside parties responsible for contamination. These potential charges, which cannot be quantified at this time, are not expected to be material to CP's financial position, but may materially affect income in the particular period in which a charge is recognized. Costs related to existing, but as yet unknown, or future contamination will be accrued in the period in which they become probable and reasonably estimable.

The expense included in "Purchased services and other" for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 was $3 million and $6 million, respectively (three and six months ended June 30, 2014 - $nil and $1 million, respectively).  Provisions for environmental remediation costs are recorded in "Other long-term liabilities", except for the current portion which is recorded in "Accounts payable and accrued liabilities".  The total amount provided at June 30, 2015 was $94 million (December 31, 2014 - $91 million).  Payments are expected to be made over 10 years to 2025.

Non-GAAP Measures - Unaudited

The Company presents non-GAAP measures and cash flow information to provide a basis for evaluating underlying earnings and liquidity trends in its business that can be compared with the results of operations in prior periods.  In addition, these non-GAAP measures facilitate a multi-period assessment of long-term profitability allowing management and other external users of the Company's consolidated financial statements to compare profitability on a long-term basis with that of the Company's peers.

These non-GAAP measures exclude foreign currency translation effects on long-term debt, which can be volatile and short term, and other significant items that are not among the Company's normal ongoing revenues and operating expenses.  They have no standardized meaning and are not defined by GAAP and, therefore, are unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies.

Adjusted Performance Measures
Income, excluding significant items, also referred to as Adjusted earnings, provides management with a measure of income on an ongoing basis.

Diluted earnings per share ("EPS"), excluding significant items, also referred to as Adjusted EPS, provides the same information on a per share basis.

Significant items
Significant items are material transactions that may include, but are not limited to, restructuring and asset impairment charges, gains and losses on non-routine sales of assets and other items that are neither normal course business activities or among our normal ongoing revenues and operating expenses.

Items that impacted reported second-quarter 2015 earnings include:

• a $10 million gain ($9 million after-tax) due to foreign exchange translation on U.S dollar-denominated debt which favourably impacted Diluted EPS by 5 cents
• an income tax expense of $23 million as a result of the change in the Alberta provincial corporate income tax rate which unfavourably impacted Diluted EPS by 14 cents

There were no significant items in the second quarter of 2014.

Items that impacted reported six months ended 2015 and 2014 earnings, in addition to those discussed above, include:

2015:

• in the first quarter, a $64 million charge ($55 million after-tax) due to foreign exchange translation on U.S dollar-denominated debt which unfavourably impacted Diluted EPS by 34 cents

2014:

• in the first quarter, a $4 million recovery ($3 million after-tax) for experience gains from the Company's 2012 labour restructuring initiative which favourably impacted Diluted EPS by 2 cents

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP measures to GAAP measures
The following tables reconcile Adjusted earnings and Adjusted EPS to Net income and Diluted earnings per share, respectively.

Free Cash
Free cash is a non-GAAP measure that management considers to be an indicator of liquidity.  The measure is used by management to provide information with respect to the relationship between cash provided by operating activities and investment decisions and provides a comparable measure for period to period changes.  Free cash is calculated as cash provided by operating activities, less cash used in investing activities, excluding changes in restricted cash and cash equivalents  and investment balances used to collateralize letters of credit, and dividends paid, adjusted for changes in cash and cash equivalents balances resulting from foreign exchange ("FX") fluctuations.

 

Foreign Exchange Adjusted Variance
Foreign exchange adjusted variance ("FX adj. variance") allows certain financial results to be viewed without the impact of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, thereby facilitating period-to-period comparisons in the analysis of trends in business performance.  Financial results at a constant currency are obtained by translating the previous period results in U.S. dollars at the foreign exchange rate of the comparable period of the current year.  Measures at constant currency are considered non-GAAP measures and do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP and, therefore, are unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies.

 

 

 

SOURCE Canadian Pacific