Third Court of Appeals Finds that Texas Franchise Tax Gross Receipts Do Not Include Sales Allowances, Even if Recorded in a Separate Account

News provided by

Apr 02, 2015, 02:57 ET

DALLAS, April 2, 2015 /PRNewswire/ -- In Gulf Chemical and Metallurgical Corporation v. Glenn Hegar, the Third Court of Appeals ("Appellate Court") on March 26, 2015, found that 1) certain credits to customers constituted allowances and 2) the allowances should be netted against total receipts when calculating the apportionment factor despite the fact that the taxpayer had not recorded the credits on its federal tax return as allowances.

Ryan is an award-winning global tax services firm, with the largest indirect and property tax practices in North America and the sixth largest corporate tax practice in the United States.

On the issue whether the credits constituted allowances, the Appellate Court found that the Comptroller's position ignored the legal and accounting substance of the transactions and that Gulf Chemical and Metallurgical Corporation ("Gulf") did provide evidence that the amounts at issue constituted "allowances." The sales transactions were accounted for using the accrual method of accounting, which is governed by Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). In Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 01-09, GAAP provides that consideration given by a vendor is presumed to reduce the selling price.

During the claim period, the language in Tax Code Section 171.1121(a) provided that "'gross receipts' means all revenues reportable by a corporation on its federal tax return, without deduction for the cost of property sold, materials used, labor performed, or other costs incurred, unless otherwise specifically provided in this chapter." Except for replacing the reference to "corporation" with "taxable entity," the language in the current version is the same. In addition, Tax Code Section 171.1121(b) during the claim provided that "[e]xcept as otherwise provided by this section, a corporation shall use the same accounting methods to apportion taxable earned surplus as used in computing reportable federal taxable income." The current version of Section 171.1121(b) also changes the "corporation" reference, and in addition, it removes the reference to "reportable federal taxable income." Specifically, Section 171.1121(b) provides that "…a taxable entity shall use the same accounting methods to apportion margin used in computing margin."

Since the Appellate Court concluded that the federal income tax return treatment is not an accounting method, it is critical to consider the actual legal and accounting substance of sales transactions to determine the proper amount of gross receipts for apportionment purposes. A reduction to both the numerator (Texas gross receipts) and the denominator (Everywhere gross receipts) may have a significant impact on a taxpayer's apportionment factor.

About RyanNorth Americathe United StatesNetherlandsAmsterdamEuropeDallas, TexasmyRyan ryan.com/Netherlands.

Logo - http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20140716/127737

TECHNICAL INFORMATION CONTACTS:

Eric L. Stein[email protected]

Sandi Farquharson
Director
Ryan
512.476.0022
[email protected]

SOURCE Ryan, LLC