Today, rapid antigen tests are widely used as one of the tools in the protection against the SARS-CoV-2 virus and are recommended to people who will meet during the Christmas period. They are inexpensive and deliver a result within 20 minutes. An antigen test is less sensitive compared to a PCR test, but it was assumed that antigen tests are sensitive during peak viral load, when people are contagious. This assumption was based on the data from PCR tests with nasopharyngeal swabs, which showed a lower viral load at an early stage of infection.
New data, based on molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 in exhaled breath using a portable sampler developed by imec, now contradicts this assumption. A longitudinal study from KU Leuven, UZ Leuven and imec revealed clear differences in the temporal dynamics of viral load for nasopharyngeal swab, saliva, breath, and antigen tests. Of the 58 high-risk contacts included in the clinical study, 11 developed an infection and were sampled for two weeks daily or twice a day. During the first two days of the infection, half of the rapid antigen tests resulted in false negatives. While the PCR tests performed on nasopharyngeal swabs showed a viral load that peaks on day four or five, the PCR tests performed on the breath samples show an early peak followed by a slow decline.
"We already knew that exhaled particles are playing a key role in viral spreading, especially in poorly ventilated spaces where people congregate. We now also learned that the exhaled viral load peaks in an early phase of infection, before rapid antigen tests are reliably positive," says Emmanuel André, clinical microbiologist at KU Leuven.
"Given these observed exhaled viral load dynamics, we can conclude that a negative rapid antigen test just before a meeting offers no guarantee to protect others, in particular when the person tested has recently been exposed to the virus. A negative antigen test should not replace self-isolation when the chance of developing the disease is high, such as during the first seven days following a high risk contact."
The paper reporting these results has been published in preprint on https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-1104361/v1. Preceding formal peer review, KU Leuven, UZ Leuven and imec have decided to communicate the preliminary results in the interest of public health, as they are an important indication that a negative rapid antigen test just before a meeting offers no guarantee to protect others.
About imec
Imec is a world-leading research and innovation center in nanoelectronics and digital technologies. Imec leverages its state-of-the-art R&D infrastructure and its team of more than 5,000 employees and top researchers, for R&D in advanced semiconductor and system scaling, silicon photonics, artificial intelligence, beyond 5G communications and sensing technologies, and in application domains such as health and life sciences, mobility, industry 4.0, agrofood, smart cities, sustainable energy, education, … Imec unites world-industry leaders across the semiconductor value chain, Flanders-based and international tech, pharma, medical and ICT companies, start-ups, and academia and knowledge centers. Imec is headquartered in Leuven (Belgium), and has research sites across Belgium, in the Netherlands and the USA, and offices in China, India, Taiwan and Japan. In 2020, imec's revenue (P&L) totaled 680 million euro.
Further information on imec can be found at www.imec-int.com.
Imec is a registered trademark for the activities of imec International (IMEC International, a legal entity set up under Belgian law as a "stichting van openbaar nut"), imec Belgium (IMEC vzw supported by the Flemish Government), imec the Netherlands (Stichting IMEC Nederland), imec Taiwan (IMEC Taiwan Co.), imec China (IMEC Microelectronics (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.), imec India (IMEC India Private Limited), imec San Francisco (IMEC Inc.) and imec Florida (IMEC USA Nanoelectronics Design Center Inc.).
SOURCE Imec
Share this article