J.D. Power Reports: Automotive Financing Customer Satisfaction Is Not Driven by One Element, But Is Influenced by Processes across the Entire Life of the Loan or Lease
Lincoln Automotive Financial Services Ranks Highest in the Luxury Segment; Volkswagen Credit Ranks Highest in the Mass Market Segment
WESTLAKE VILLAGE, Calif., Nov. 20, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- Automotive finance providers cannot focus their efforts on only one or two areas of the lending process and expect to have satisfied customers; they need to excel in all areas throughout the life of the loan or lease according to the J.D. Power 2014 U.S. Consumer Financing Satisfaction StudySM released today.
The study, which was redesigned for 2014 to include used vehicles and expand the time from the financing origination to four years vs. one year used in previous studies, examines the overall customer experience with financing either an automotive loan or lease. The study measures satisfaction among customers who financed or leased their vehicle indirectly through a dealer or directly through an auto finance provider in four key factors: on-boarding process; billing and payment process; website; and phone contact. The study is conducted in two vehicle segments: luxury and mass market. Satisfaction is calculated on a 1,000-point scale.
"Satisfying auto financing customers is not contingent on excelling in one area; it's a continuum across the entire process, with the stage set during the on-boarding process—or the initial discussion with customers—and continuing through the billing and payment process," said Mike Buckingham, senior director of the automotive finance practice at J.D. Power. "The execution of finance process best practices is more important than the innovation of new tools to complete transactions. All lenders use mostly the same technology, but the ones that execute better across all areas are the ones with the most satisfied customers."
Buckingham noted that technology does play a key role during the billing and payment process, which is the factor with the most impact on overall satisfaction. Many customers seek not only self-service tools to set up an automatic payment system, but they also want tools to confirm that their payments were received and processed and to check the balance of their account, with many preferring to conduct these activities using their computer, tablet or smartphone.
"Lenders need to make it easy for customers to access their account anytime anywhere," said Buckingham. "That means providing a website and apps that are reliable and that make the most critical elements of the billing process easily identifiable."
KEY FINDINGS
- Overall satisfaction in both the luxury and mass market segments is significantly higher for loans on new vehicles (844) than on used vehicles (817). That difference is driven largely by significantly higher satisfaction in the billing and payment process and website factors among customers with a new-vehicle loan origination (846 and 840, respectively) than among those with a used-vehicle financing origination (819 and 817, respectively).
- The loan and lease experience differs by segment, with overall satisfaction in the luxury segment significantly higher for leases (847) than for loans (840). The opposite is true in the mass market segment, where satisfaction is significantly higher for loans (815) than for leases (807).
- Ensuring customer satisfaction is critical for finance providers, as more than 90 percent of highly satisfied customers (overall satisfaction scores of more than 800 points) indicate they "definitely will" use their current lender in the future. Further, more than 50 percent of customers indicate that they selected their provider based on inputs other than dealer recommendations.
- Avoidance of billing and payment errors is the most influential key performance indicator impacting satisfaction. Incorrect payment amounts listed on statements, misapplied payments, or incorrect/not updated personal account information leave customers with a perception that their finance provider is disorganized.
2014 U.S. Consumer Financing Satisfaction Rankings
Lincoln Automotive Financial Services (867) ranks highest in the luxury segment for the second consecutive year and performs highest in the billing and payment process and website factors. Lexus Financial Services (859) ranks second and Audi Financial Services (854) ranks third.
Volkswagen Credit ranks highest in the mass market segment with a score of 836 and also scores highest in billing and payment process (tied with Ford Credit) and website. Ford Credit ranks second with a score of 835 and Honda Financial Services ranks third with 829.
The 2014 U.S. Consumer Financing Satisfaction Study is based on responses from 20,670 new and used vehicle purchasers or lessees who obtained a vehicle loan or lease. The study includes vehicles financed for model years 2010 through 2014. The study was fielded between July and September 2014.
Overall Customer Satisfaction Index Scores |
J.D. Power.com Power Circle Ratings™ |
||
(Based on a 1,000-point scale) |
For Consumers |
||
Luxury Market Brand |
|||
Lincoln Automotive Financial Services |
867 |
5 |
|
Lexus Financial Services |
859 |
5 |
|
Audi Financial Services |
854 |
4 |
|
BMW Financial Services |
852 |
3 |
|
Mercedes-Benz Financial Services |
851 |
3 |
|
Land Rover Financial Group |
846 |
3 |
|
Acura Financial Services |
845 |
3 |
|
Luxury Average |
843 |
3 |
|
Ally Financial |
834 |
3 |
|
Chase Automotive Finance |
831 |
3 |
|
Infiniti Financial Services |
823 |
2 |
|
Bank of America |
811 |
2 |
|
Wells Fargo Dealer Services |
799 |
2 |
|
US Bank |
770 |
2 |
|
Note: Included in this study but not ranked due to small sample size is SunTrust Bank. |
|||
Mass Market Brand |
|||
Volkswagen Credit |
836 |
5 |
|
Ford Credit |
835 |
5 |
|
Honda Financial Services |
829 |
5 |
|
Capital One Auto Finance |
821 |
3 |
|
World Omni Financial Corp |
821 |
3 |
|
Toyota Financial Services |
820 |
3 |
|
Subaru Motors Finance |
819 |
3 |
|
Bank of America |
816 |
3 |
|
Ally Financial |
815 |
3 |
|
Mass Market Average |
814 |
3 |
|
Kia Motors Finance |
813 |
3 |
|
Mazda Capital Services |
813 |
3 |
|
Chase Automotive Finance |
808 |
3 |
|
NMAC |
806 |
3 |
|
Hyundai Motor Finance |
804 |
3 |
|
TD Auto Finance |
802 |
3 |
|
Wells Fargo Dealer Services |
798 |
3 |
|
Chrysler Capital |
782 |
2 |
|
US Bank |
781 |
2 |
|
PNC Bank |
778 |
2 |
|
SunTrust Bank |
762 |
2 |
|
Fifth Third Bank |
755 |
2 |
|
Santander Auto Finance |
730 |
2 |
|
Power Circle Ratings Legend |
|||
5 – Among the best |
|||
4 – Better than most |
|||
3 – About average |
|||
2 – The rest |
Media Relations Contacts
John Tews; Troy, Mich.; 248-680-6218; [email protected]
About J.D. Power and Advertising/Promotional Rules www.jdpower.com/about-us/press-release-info
About McGraw Hill Financial www.mhfi.com
Logo - http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20130605/LA26502LOGO
SOURCE J.D. Power
Related Links
WANT YOUR COMPANY'S NEWS FEATURED ON PRNEWSWIRE.COM?
Newsrooms &
Influencers
Digital Media
Outlets
Journalists
Opted In
Share this article