J.D. Power and Associates Reports: Relationships Fostered under Preferred Programs Significantly Increase Dealer Satisfaction and the Percentage of Business Sent to Lenders
BMW Financial Services Ranks Highest in Dealer Satisfaction in Prime Retail Credit and Retail Leasing Rankings; Mercedes-Benz Financial Services Ranks Highest in Floor Planning
WESTLAKE VILLAGE, Calif., July 31, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- Satisfaction with automotive finance providers is significantly higher among dealers who have a preferred relationship with their lender, which is driven by a higher number of automated approvals, faster funding, more interactions with their sales representative and a perceived increase in the flexibility of the lender's buying policy, according to the J.D. Power and Associates 2012 U.S. Dealer Financing Satisfaction StudySM released today.
(Logo: http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20050527/LAF028LOGO-a)
Preferred relationships are instituted by lenders that want to capture a larger percentage and/or a certain mix of a dealership's business and are often targeted to the lender's best dealerships. Preferred dealers who complete a certain volume or mix of their business with their lender are often rewarded under the terms of preferred relationships with rate discounts, better access to special programs and an improved service experience, compared with traditional relationships.
Among preferred dealers, overall satisfaction with their prime retail credit lender is 919 (on a 1,000-point scale), compared with 845 among dealers without a preferred arrangement. The largest gaps in satisfaction scores between preferred and traditional relationships are in the usefulness of dealership visits (9.3 vs. 8.1, on a 10-point scale, respectively), and flexibility of the buying policy attributes (9.1 vs. 7.9, respectively).
"The usefulness of dealership visits and the flexibility of the buying policy are among the most important attributes of the overall relationship, so the gap in scores is extremely significant," said Lisa Chubliski, client services director of auto finance at J.D. Power and Associates.
Nearly two-thirds (63%) of dealers in a preferred relationship indicate they receive funding in less than 24 hours vs. 46 percent of dealers in a traditional relationship. There is an even larger difference in the frequency of sales representative visits, with 58 percent of dealers in a preferred relationship receiving sales representative visits 12 times per year vs. 33 percent of dealers in a traditional relationship.
"While not new to the industry, preferred relationships are increasing and are becoming an intriguing alternative to traditional relationships for both parties involved," said Chlubiski. "Once the preferred relationship is established, dealerships are finding it easier to complete deals, service their customers quickly and optimize the relationship with their lender."
The study finds that preferred relationships are not exclusive to the captive lenders.
"While captive lenders, by nature, offer a large percentage of preferred relationships, a notable 56 percent of banks and 30 percent of independents also offer preferred relationships," said Chlubiski. "While preferred relationships may lead to more business and better service for the dealership, they are not necessarily the right fit for all relationships. The fear of restrictions or the potential of damaging other relationships may push dealerships to remain in traditional relationships with lenders."
Preferred relationships are designed to have a considerable impact on the percentage of dealership business sent to lenders. Among lenders that account for between 26 percent and 50 percent of a dealer's total prime business, 79 percent are lenders who are defined as "preferred." That percentage increases to 90 percent among lenders that account for more than 50 percent of a dealer's total prime business.
Dealer Financing Satisfaction Findings
The study examines dealer satisfaction with lenders in four finance areas: prime retail credit; sub-prime retail credit[1]; retail leasing; and floor planning. Satisfaction is measured across three factors in the prime retail credit and sub-prime retail credit areas: finance provider offering; application/approval process; and sales representative relationship. Four factors are measured in the retail leasing area: finance provider offering; application/approval process; sales representative relationship; and vehicle return process. Three factors are measured in the floor planning area: finance provider credit line offering; floor plan support; and floor plan portfolio management.
Dealer satisfaction with automotive lenders has increased across all areas. Overall dealer satisfaction with prime retail credit lenders averages 885, an increase of 23 index points from 2011. Retail leasing satisfaction is 891, up 14 points from 2011, and floor planning satisfaction is 913, up 10 points.
Prime Retail Credit
BMW Financial Services ranks highest among prime retail credit lenders with a score of 963. Following in the rankings are Alphera Financial Services (959) and Mercedes-Benz Financial Services (948).
Retail Leasing
BMW Financial Services ranks highest among lessors in the retail leasing area with a score of 959. Mercedes-Benz Financial Services follows closely in the rankings with a score of 958. Ford Credit ranks third with a score of 911.
Floor Planning
Mercedes-Benz Financial Services ranks highest among floor planning lenders with a score of 964, followed by BMW Financial Services (960) and Ford Credit (935).
The 212 U.S. Dealer Financing Satisfaction Study is based on responses from 3,064 dealers who were surveyed between March and April 2012.
Dealer Satisfaction Index Ranking |
|
Prime Retail Credit |
|
(Based on a 1,000-point scale) |
|
BMW Financial Services |
963 |
Alphera Financial Services |
959 |
Mercedes-Benz Financial Services |
948 |
-Ford Credit |
923 |
Honda Financial Services |
906 |
Toyota Financial Services |
903 |
M&I Bank |
898 |
BB&T |
896 |
Ally Financial |
895 |
Huntington National Bank |
895 |
M&T Bank |
890 |
BMO Harris Bank |
889 |
PNC Bank |
889 |
Industry Average |
885 |
Fifth Third Bank |
884 |
Suntrust Bank |
884 |
RBS Citizens |
883 |
Volkswagen Credit |
883 |
Wells Fargo Dealer Services |
880 |
Capital One Auto Finance |
879 |
Hyundai Motor Finance |
878 |
Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp. |
871 |
Chase Automotive Finance |
870 |
TD Auto Finance |
867 |
Bank of America |
866 |
Infiniti Financial Services |
865 |
US Bank |
859 |
Kia Motors Finance |
848 |
Bank of the West |
846 |
Credit Union Direct Lending |
845 |
GM Financial |
838 |
Included in the study but not ranked due to small sample size are Mini Financial Services; Security Service Federal CU; Lexus Financial Services; Compass Bank; Subaru Motors Finance; AmeriCredit; and Santander Auto Finance.
Dealer Satisfaction Index Ranking |
|
Retail Leasing |
|
(Based on a 1,000-point scale) |
|
BMW Financial Services |
959 |
Mercedes-Benz Financial Services |
958 |
Ford Credit |
911 |
Toyota Financial Services |
902 |
Honda Financial Services |
901 |
Industry Average |
891 |
Infiniti Financial Services |
887 |
Ally Financial |
883 |
Volkswagen Credit |
879 |
Hyundai Motor Finance |
860 |
Kia Motors Finance |
858 |
Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp. |
842 |
GM Financial |
824 |
Chase Automotive Finance |
819 |
US Bank |
782 |
Included in the study but not ranked due to small sample size are Lexus Financial Services and Subaru Motors Finance
Dealer Satisfaction Index Ranking |
|
Floor Planning |
|
(Based on a 1,000-point scale) |
|
Mercedes-Benz Financial Services |
964 |
BMW Financial Services |
960 |
Ford Credit |
935 |
Kia Motor Finance |
927 |
Bank of America |
926 |
Industry Average |
913 |
Chase Automotive Finance |
909 |
Toyota Financial Services |
904 |
Wells Fargo Dealer Services |
901 |
Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp. |
898 |
Hyundai Motor Finance |
894 |
Ally Financial |
893 |
Included in the study but not ranked due to small sample size are Honda Financial Services and Volkswagen Credit.
About J.D. Power and Associates
Headquartered in Westlake Village, Calif., J.D. Power and Associates is a global marketing information services company providing performance improvement, social media and customer satisfaction insights and solutions. The company's quality and satisfaction measurements are based on responses from millions of consumers annually. For more information on airlines, hotels and rental car reviews and ratings, car reviews and ratings, car insurance, health insurance, cell phone ratings, and more, please visit JDPower.com. J.D. Power and Associates is a business unit of The McGraw-Hill Companies.
About The McGraw-Hill Companies
McGraw-Hill announced on September 12, 2011, its intention to separate into two public companies: McGraw-Hill Financial, a leading provider of content and analytics to global financial markets, and McGraw-Hill Education, a leading education company focused on digital learning and education services worldwide. McGraw-Hill Financial's leading brands include Standard & Poor's Ratings Services, S&P Capital IQ, S&P Indices, Platts energy information services and J.D. Power and Associates. With sales of $6.2 billion in 2011, the Corporation has approximately 23,000 employees across more than 280 offices in 40 countries. Additional information is available at http://www.mcgraw-hill.com/.
J.D. Power and Associates Media Relations Contacts:
John Tews; Troy, Mich.; (248) 680-6218; [email protected]
Syvetril Perryman; Westlake Village, Calif.; (805) 418-8103; [email protected]
No advertising or other promotional use can be made of the information in this release without the express prior written consent of J.D. Power and Associates. www.jdpower.com/corporate
[1] No awards were presented in the sub-prime retail credit segment due to insufficient market representation.
SOURCE J.D. Power and Associates
WANT YOUR COMPANY'S NEWS FEATURED ON PRNEWSWIRE.COM?
Newsrooms &
Influencers
Digital Media
Outlets
Journalists
Opted In
Share this article