11,000 Pages of Evidence Filed in Landmark 5G Case Against the FCC, Hearing on Jan. 25

WASHINGTON, Jan. 22, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- Oral arguments are scheduled for Monday, January 25, 2021 at 9:30 am (EST) for the landmark case Environmental Health Trust (EHT), Children's Health Defense (CHD) et al vs. the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The appeal seeks to have the court order the FCC to remand, vacate and update its 25-year-old exposure guidelines for radio-frequency radiation (RFR) from cellphones, cell towers, Wi-Fi, 5G and other wireless communication devices.

Arguments in the case will be livestreamed via audio. The presiding three-judge panel in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia includes the Honorable Karen Henderson, Patricia Millett and Robert Wilkins.

The court ordered that one attorney present the case for all the Petitioners allocating 10 minutes each for the Petitioners and the FCC. EHT and CHD have agreed to have CHD's attorney, Scott McCullough, former Assistant Texas Attorney General and telecom attorney, to present the Petitioners' joint argument. Robert F Kennedy, Jr., CHD's Chairman, is the organization's co-counsel. 

EHT is represented by attorney Edward B. Myers, who intervened in the successful case of the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) and several Native American Tribes when the court upheld the relevance of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in FCC's  5G proceedings. The NRDC filed an amicus brief in the Petitioners' case.

The Petitioners contend the FCC ignored extensive evidence submitted to the agency showing that non-thermal levels of pulsed and modulated RFR emitted by wireless technology are harmful to humans, wildlife and the environment, and its order failed to provide a record of a reasoned decision making. Therefore, the Petitioners claim the FCC has violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), and its decision is capricious, arbitrary and not evidence-based. In addition, the Petitioners argue that the FCC violated NEPA because the Agency failed to consider the environmental impacts of its decision. It also violated the 1996 Telecommunications Act (TCA) because it failed to consider the impact of its decision on public health and safety.

The FCC ignored numerous submissions detailing injuries and rapidly growing illnesses such as Radiation Sickness from radiofrequency radiation. Petitioners argued that the inadequate FCC guidelines are used to deny accommodation in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The Petitioners filed 11,000 pages of evidence in support of their claims. 

Contacts:
Dafna Tachover
202-599-1461

Theodora Scarato
301-765-7016

SOURCE Children's Health Defense

Related Links

http://www.childrenshealthdefense.org