Health Advocates Submit Letter to FDA Regarding Biosimilars Policy and Women's Health
SWHR and Many Other Leading Patient Advocates Urge FDA to Consider Gender-Based Disparities in Medical Research and Treatment When Establishing Approach to Naming
WASHINGTON, May 22, 2014 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The Society for Women's Health Research (SWHR), the leading voice on research into the biological differences between women and men, and 45 other women's health, physician and patient advocacy groups, have sent a letter to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Dr. Margaret Hamburg urging FDA to give serious consideration to sex-based disparities in health research and treatments as it arrives at a policy for naming biosimilars.
Women patients and their advocates have a number of reasons to take special interest in the proper use of biologic medicines. "Women are disproportionately impacted by many diseases and chronic conditions, are often underrepresented in clinical trials, and even when they are represented, clinical results are not routinely analyzed by sex," said SWHR President and CEO Phyllis Greenberger. "As such, the long-term effects and adverse reactions of biologics on female patients are not known."
The letter urges FDA to consider the unique impact of biologics on women. "As FDA moves forward to approve biosimilars," the letter states, "We believe it is imperative that all biologics have distinguishable names. Distinguishable names will enable the gathering of sufficient data to ultimately allow providers to fully understand how all biologics – including biosimilars – are performing for both men and women."
The letter also urges greater study of women in clinical trials and medical research, and notes the increasing importance of sex-based medical research and treatments:
- "Sex is a key factor in the onset, prevalence, and severity of diseases and chronic conditions. These differences are significant and must be taken into consideration in treatments
- Many of the diseases that are, and will be treated through the use of biologics, disproportionately affect women. Cancer is just one example where differences in race and sex can very much increase a patient's possibility of being impacted
- Many diseases place a heavier burden on women than on men (for example, heart disease, cancer, rheumatoid arthritis and osteoporosis); however, treatment guidelines are based largely on data from men. Women also rely more on medical systems than men do and are likely to seek treatment sooner
- Autoimmune diseases are one of the top 10 leading causes of death among U.S. women aged 65 and under. Many autoimmune diseases are treated by biologics and some, such as lupus and Sjögren's Syndrome, strike women nine times more often than men
- Sex-based differences are observed in response to many drugs. Females have a 1.5 to 1.7 fold greater risk of developing an adverse drug reaction, and several drugs have been withdrawn from the market over the last two decades for sex-based adverse events
In addition to SWHR, signatories for the letter include the following 46 organizations and two individuals representing millions of U.S. women, the providers who care for them, and the advocates who seek to promote their health and well-being:
- Academy of Women's Health
- American Autoimmune Related Diseases Association
- American Behcet's Disease Association
- Barbra Streisand Women's Heart Center at Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute
- Black Women's Health Imperative
- Center for the Study of Sex Differences in Health, Aging and Disease at Georgetown University
- Coalition for Pulmonary Fibrosis
- Colon Cancer Alliance
- Crohn's & Colitis Foundation of America
- Digestive Disease National Coalition
- Foundation for Women's Health
- Global Healthy Living Foundation
- HealthyWomen.org
- International Cancer Advocacy Network
- International Pemphigus & Pemphigoid Foundation
- International Society for Gender Medicine
- Interstitial Cystitis Association
- Jewish Women International
- Kidney Cancer Association
- Lupus Alliance of Long Island/Queens
- Lupus Alliance of Upstate New York
- Lung Cancer Alliance
- Lupus Foundation of America
- Lupus Foundation of Colorado
- Lupus Foundation of Florida, Inc.
- Lupus Foundation of Mid and Northern New York, Inc.
- Lupus Foundation of Southern California
- Michigan Lupus Foundation
- National Adrenal Diseases Foundation
- National Fibromyalgia & Chronic Pain Association
- National Organization for Women
- New York State Rare Disease Alliance
- Pulmonary Hypertension Association
- RESOLVE: The National Infertility Association
- Scleroderma Foundation
- Sex and Gender Women's Health Collaborative
- Sjögren's Syndrome Foundation
- The Endometriosis Association
- The Endometriosis Foundation of America
- The Marfan Foundation
- U.S. Pain Foundation
- Vasculitis Foundation
- Virginia Commonwealth University Institute for Women's Health
- WomenHeart: The National Coalition for Women with Heart Disease
- Women's Health Research Institute at Northwestern University
- Marek Glezerman, MD, President
- International Society for Gender Medicine
- Theresa Rohr-Kirchgraber, MD, FACP, Executive Director Indiana University National Center of Excellence in Women's Health
A copy of the full letter is below.
May 21, 2014
The Honorable Margaret Hamburg
Commissioner
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
Dear Commissioner Hamburg:
We submit this letter on behalf of the 46 undersigned groups and two individual signers, representing millions of U.S. women, the providers who care for them, and the advocates who seek to promote their health and well-being.
Twenty-five years of advances in biological medicines have dramatically changed the therapeutic options available to patients and prescribers. Newer options hold even greater promise for treating and possibly curing debilitating diseases.
Women patients and their advocates have a number of reasons to take special interest in the proper use of biologic medicines. It is well-established that many diseases and conditions affect women and men differently and that the same is true of the therapies that treat them. We appreciate the steps that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has taken to make it more likely that medical research and treatments for diseases and conditions are analyzed to identify sex-based disparities in outcomes and side effects. This is increasingly important because:
- Sex is a key factor in the onset, prevalence, and severity of diseases and chronic conditions. These differences are significant and must be taken into consideration in treatments.
- Many of the diseases that are and will be treated through the use of biologics disproportionately affect women. Cancer is just one example where differences in race and sex can very much increase a patient's possibility of being impacted.
- Many diseases place a heavier burden on women than on men (for example, heart disease, cancer, rheumatoid arthritis and osteoporosis); however, treatment guidelines are based largely on data on men. Women also rely more on medical systems than men do and are likely to seek treatment sooner.[i]
- Autoimmune diseases are one of the top 10 leading causes of death among U.S. women aged 65 and under. Many autoimmune diseases are treated by biologics and some, such as lupus and Sjögren's Syndrome, strike women nine times more often than men.[ii]
- Sex-based differences are observed in response to many drugs. Females have a 1.5 to 1.7 fold greater risk of developing an adverse drug reaction, and several drugs have been withdrawn from the market over the last two decades for sex-based adverse events.[iii]
Further, because women are often underrepresented in clinical trials, little may be known about impacts of treatments on female populations until after FDA approval when a new biologic is first used in a heterogeneous population through clinical care. This is compounded by the historic and continuing lack of understanding of sex-based differences in clinical trials. Specifically:
- The number of women participating in clinical trials has increased during the last two decades, but women are still underrepresented in clinical trials in general. Some of the overall increase can be attributed to the greater number of women-only trials (of therapies for diseases that affect only women). Even when women are included in clinical trials, the results are often not analyzed separately by sex.[iv]
- A recent Institute of Medicine consensus report found that "limitations in the design, analysis, and scientific reporting of health research have slowed progress in women's health."[v]
This means that for millions of female patients, any potential increase or decrease in effectiveness of a biologic, along with side effects and adverse reactions, will only be discovered after the treatment is approved and under active use. Thus, the complexity and variability of treatment paradigms using biologics will be a continuing concern to providers serving female patients.
As states across the country look to the FDA for guidance on issues surrounding biosimilarity, interchangeability, and therapeutic substitution, the agency's views on sex and genomic-based differences will be crucial.
For all these reasons, as FDA moves forward to approve biosimilars, we believe it is imperative that all biologics have distinguishable names. Distinguishable names will enable the gathering of sufficient data to ultimately allow providers to fully understand how all biologics – including biosimilars – are performing for both men and women. Furthermore, as the FDA continues to address patient safety, we urge states to ensure the safety of women, and all patients, by enacting legislation that mandates physician notification and record keeping when biosimilars are substituted. This will lessen the inevitable confusion and assure optimal medical care in the use of biosimilars among female populations.
We urge the FDA to give serious consideration to the voices specifically focused on and attuned to sex-based disparities in health as it arrives at a policy for naming biosimilars. We thank you for the opportunity to raise our voice on behalf of female patients, and the caregivers and providers they trust.
Sincerely,
Society for Women's Health Research
Academy of Women's Health
American Autoimmune Related Diseases Association
American Behcet's Disease Association
Barbra Streisand Women's Heart Center at Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute
Black Women's Health Imperative
Center for the Study of Sex Differences in Health, Aging and Disease at Georgetown University
Coalition for Pulmonary Fibrosis
Colon Cancer Alliance
Crohn's & Colitis Foundation of America
Digestive Disease National Coalition
Foundation for Women's Health
Global Healthy Living Foundation
HealthyWomen.org
International Cancer Advocacy Network
International Pemphigus & Pemphigoid Foundation
International Society for Gender Medicine
Interstitial Cystitis Association
Jewish Women International
Kidney Cancer Association
Lupus Alliance of Long Island/Queens
Lupus Alliance of Upstate New York
Lung Cancer Alliance
Lupus Foundation of America
Lupus Foundation of Colorado
Lupus Foundation of Florida, Inc.
Lupus Foundation of Mid and Northern New York, Inc.
Lupus Foundation of Southern California
Michigan Lupus Foundation
National Adrenal Diseases Foundation
National Fibromyalgia & Chronic Pain Association
National Organization for Women
New York State Rare Disease Alliance
Pulmonary Hypertension Association
RESOLVE: The National Infertility Association
Scleroderma Foundation
Sex and Gender Women's Health Collaborative
Sjögren's Syndrome Foundation
The Endometriosis Association
The Endometriosis Foundation of America
The Marfan Foundation
U.S. Pain Foundation
Vasculitis Foundation
Virginia Commonwealth University Institute for Women's Health
WomenHeart: The National Coalition for Women with Heart Disease
Women's Health Research Institute at Northwestern University
Marek Glezerman, MD, President
International Society for Gender Medicine
Theresa Rohr-Kirchgraber, MD, FACP, Executive Director
Indiana University National Center of Excellence in Women's Health
cc: Marsha Henderson, MCRP, Assistant Commissioner for Women's Health, FDA
[Members of the Congressional Caucus for Women's Issues]
The Society for Women's Health Research (SWHR®), the national thought leader in the study of sex differences in disease, is dedicated to transforming women's health through science, advocacy and education. SWHR® advocates for increased public and private funding for women's health; greater inclusion of women and minorities in medical studies; and analysis of the biological differences between men and women in disease and health issues. For more information, visit SWHR.org.
[i] http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=13307&page=6
[ii] http://www.aarda.org/autoimmune-information/autoimmune-disease-in-women/
[iii] http://www.fda.gov/downloads/ScienceResearch/SpecialTopics/WomensHealthResearch/UCM334959.pdf
[iv] http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13307
[v] http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=13307&page=3
SOURCE The Society for Women’s Health Research (SWHR)
WANT YOUR COMPANY'S NEWS FEATURED ON PRNEWSWIRE.COM?
Newsrooms &
Influencers
Digital Media
Outlets
Journalists
Opted In
Share this article