Future of the US Defense Industry - Market Attractiveness, Competitive Landscape and Forecasts to 2017

NEW YORK, May 30, 2013 /PRNewswire/ -- Reportlinker.com announces that a new market research report is available in its catalogue:

Future of the US Defense Industry - Market Attractiveness, Competitive Landscape and Forecasts to 2017

http://www.reportlinker.com/p01105873/Future-of-the-US-Defense-Industry---Market-Attractiveness-Competitive-Landscape-and-Forecasts-to-2017.html#utm_source=prnewswire&utm_medium=pr&utm_campaign=Aerospace_and_Defense

Synopsis

This report is the result of SDI's extensive market and company research covering the US defense industry, and provides detailed analysis of both historic and forecast defense industry values including key growth stimulators, analysis of the leading companies in the industry, and key news.

Summary

Why was the report written?Future of the US Defense Industry – Market Attractiveness, Competitive Landscape and Forecasts to 2017 offers the reader an insight into the market opportunities and entry strategies adopted by foreign original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) to gain a market share in the US defense industry.

What is the current market landscape and what is changing?

The US has the largest defense market in the world, and in 2012 the US defense budget stood at US$645.7 billion. Expenditure is primarily driven by the modernization of existing weapon systems as well as the acquisition of advanced defense equipment capable of enhancing interoperability among the armed forces. Due to its high levels of military spending, a large number of opportunities are available to companies keen to supply the nation with defense equipment; however, pressure to reduce the debt burden after the US financial crisis has shown a negative impact on the government budget and caused cuts in defense budget as well. The US defense budget (including OCO funding), which declined at a CAGR of -0.77% during the review period, is expected to register a CAGR of -0.12% over the forecast period to reach US$611 billion by 2017. Furthermore, defense expenditure as a percentage of GDP is also estimated to decline, from an average of 4.6% during the review period to an average of 3.4% over the forecast period.

What are the key drivers behind recent market changes?Nuclear threat, modernization initiatives, arms race with China and Russia, and the protection of allies are expected to drive defense spending. The US perceives a potential nuclear threat from Iran and North Korea through their acquisition of long-range ballistic missiles, and the tension between the US and North Korea further increased in November 2010, when the US criticized the attacks carried out by North Korea on South Korea. Moreover, the nuclear threat from North Korea increased as North Korea announced its plans to carry out further long-range rocket launches and nuclear tests to fight against the US in January 2013.

What makes this report unique and essential to read?

Future of the US Defense Industry – Market Attractiveness, Competitive Landscape and Forecasts to 2017 provides detailed analysis of the current industry size and growth expectations from 2013 to 2017, including highlights of key growth stimulators. It also benchmarks the industry against key global markets and provides a detailed understanding of emerging opportunities in specific areas.

Scope

The report includes trend analysis of imports and exports, together with their implications and impact on the US defense industry.

The report covers five forces analysis to identify various power centers in the industry and how these are expected to develop in the future.

The report allows readers to identify possible ways to enter the market, together with detailed descriptions of how existing companies have entered the market, including key contracts, alliances, and strategic initiatives.

The report helps the reader to understand the competitive landscape of the defense industry in the US. It provides an overview of key defense companies, both domestic and foreign, together with insights such as key alliances, strategic initiatives, and a brief financial analysis.

Reasons To Buy

The US must modernize its aging fleet of equipment, such as fighter aircraft, helicopters, land defense systems, and maritime equipment; however, the rising unit cost of defense systems poses a challenge to procurement funding. The cost of military hardware is increasing due to technological advancements and a shortage of skilled labor in the design, engineering, and manufacturing sectors, coupled with the rising cost of input materials such as metal. In addition, the per-unit overhead costs at production facilities increased due to a reduction in the number of units manufactured. For example, in the shipbuilding industry the cost of constructing ships has been increasing 1.4% per year faster than the price of final goods and services in the US economy. The US government has reduced the amount of military hardware to be procured, resulting in a reduction in the number of units to be produced, a loss in profits, and increasing unemployment in these sectors.

The US economic crisis lead to defense budget cuts in the US, which is expected to result in termination of defense programs as well as restructure of major programs such as Joint Strike Fighter. In SDI's Defense Industry Business Outlook 2013–2014 survey, 87% of the respondents from the North American region agree that budget cut is a biggest concern for the defense industry in the coming five years. Defense budget cuts announced by the DoD due to US defense expenditure is expected to decrease from 4.1% of GDP in 2012 to 3.1% of GDP by 2017, despite the engagement of the country's troops in missions in Afghanistan and many other countries worldwide. Overall, the country's defense expenditure is forecast to decrease from US$645.7 billion in 2012 to US$611.0 billion in 2017, leading to a reduction in procurement funding. Such a reduction has had a negative impact on a number of defense projects, and has resulted in delays and cancellations.

With the US aiming to reduce the country's defense expenditure by US$34.7 billion during 2012–2017, and rising personnel and health costs, the country's capital expenditure on defense is anticipated to decrease. Furthermore, the government is encouraging companies throughout the defense market to increase the efficiency of their organizations and sell unprofitable units. In addition, reverse engineering by countries like China and Iran will enable the defense companies of these countries to offer defense equipment at lower price, posing a challenge to the domestic defense companies of the US. In SDI's Defense Industry Business Outlook 2013–2014 survey, 43% of the respondents from the North American region agree that the reverse engineering from countries is the biggest concern for the defense industry in the coming five years; as a result, defense companies will be compelled to take greater risks and accept lower profits on the limited number of available government contracts.

Key Highlights

The US encourages FDI within its economy and offers investment policies that treat domestic and foreign investors equally; however, investments that risk national security are barred using the Exon-Florio provision, a strategy that consists of three steps for reviewing proposed or pending foreign mergers, acquisitions, or takeovers, and determining if the transaction poses a risk to US national security. According to this provision, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) conducts a review on the foreign investment within 30 days, and an investigation within 45 days, which is then submitted to the President for the decision of whether to favor or deny the transaction, a process which takes 15 days. In addition, the Department of Defense has established the National Industrial Security Program (NISP), which outlines provisions under the term 'Foreign Ownership, Control or Influence (FOCI)'. The aim of such provisions is to prevent foreign firms from gaining unauthorized access to "critical technology classified information, and special classes of classified information" through the acquisition of a US company.

The US does not have an offset policy for foreign defense procurements, and prohibits government officials, employees, and agencies to become involved in any offset transaction with a foreign defense firm. However, the country practices a 'Buy American Act', which mandates that all goods for public use, such as articles, materials, or suppliers, must be produced in the US, and manufactured items must be produced within the country using domestic materials.

The homeland security budget of the US prioritizes the mission areas of preventing terrorism, securing borders, enforcing and administering immigration laws, safeguarding cyberspace, ensuring resilience to disasters, and providing essential support to national and economic security. Securing the nation from terrorism remained as a main focus of the DHS in 2013, and during the forecast period a significant amount of the homeland security budget is expected to be allocated to the prevention of terrorism and enhancement of security. Since the 9/11 terrorist attacks the US has continued to increase security levels in all its airports. In order to prevent attacks from global terrorist organizations such as al-Qaeda, an increased focus is expected to be placed on creating a multi-layered system to strengthen aviation security from the time a passenger purchases a ticket to arrival at his or her destination.

Table of Contents

1.1. What is this Report bout?

1.2. Definitions

1.3. Summary Methodology

1.4. SDI Terrorism Index

1.5. About Strategic Defence Intelligence

2 Executive Summary

3 Market Attractiveness and Emerging Opportunities

3.1. Defense Market Size Historical and Forecast

3.1.1. US defense expenditure excluding OCO funding forecast to increase to US$XX billion by 2017

3.1.2. Nuclear threat, modernization initiatives, arms race with China and Russia, and the protection of allies are expected to drive defense spending

3.1.3. Defense expenditure as a percentage of GDP projected to decline over the forecast period

3.1.4. Per capita defense spending forecast to decline over the forecast period

3.2. Analysis of Defense Budget Allocation

3.2.1. US defense budget forecast to register a decelerated growth

3.2.2. US defense base budget expected to increase to US$XX billion by 2017

3.2.3. Revenue expenditure accounts for majority of defense expenditure

3.2.4. Budget allocation for army and air force expected to decrease

3.2.5. Revenue expenditure allocation for the army expected to increase over the forecast period

3.2.6. Naval defense budget expected to grow at a CAGR of XX% over forecast period

3.2.7. US forecast to spend US$XX billion on its air force over the forecast period

3.2.8. Expenditure on other category of armed forces projected to grow at a CAGR of XX% over the forecast period

3.3. Homeland Security Market Size and Forecast

3.3.1. The US is projected to spend US$XX billion on homeland security over the forecast period

3.3.2. Preventing terrorism, a top priority of Department of Homeland Security (DHS) of the US

3.3.3. The nation is at "some risk" of terrorism

3.3.4. The US has a terrorism index score of XX

3.4. Benchmarking with Key Global Markets

3.4.1. The US will dominate global military spending over the forecast period

3.4.2. US defense budget is much higher than other leading spenders

3.4.3. US defense expenditure as a percentage of GDP is the third-highest in the world

3.4.4. US was largest global arms exporter during 2007–2011

3.4.5. The US emerged as eighth-largest global arms importer during 2007–2011

3.5. Market Opportunities: Key Trends and Growth Stimulators

3.5.1. Force Management:

3.5.2. Networking/Information Management:

3.5.3. Fighters and Multi-role Aircraft:

3.5.4. Cyber Security:

3.5.5. Missile Defense Systems:

3.5.6. Attack Aircraft MRO:

3.5.7. Space Warfare Systems:

3.5.8. Transport & Utility Aircraft:

4 Defense Procurement Market Dynamics

4.1. Import Market Dynamics

4.1.1. US primarily imports defense equipment to build strategic relations

4.1.2. Defense imports registered steady growth during 2007–2011

4.1.3. The UK supplies the majority of US defense imports

4.1.4. Aircraft account for majority of arms imports

4.2. Export Market Dynamics

4.2.1. US arms exports are driven by political and economic factors

4.2.2. Arms exports continued to increase in 2011

4.2.3. US defense exports to increase during the forecast period

4.2.4. Aircraft are the most exported defense good

4.2.5. The US maintains controlled defense export policy

5 Industry Dynamics

5.1. Five Forces Analysis

5.1.1. Bargaining power of Supplier: Medium to low

5.1.2. Bargaining power of Buyer: High

5.1.3. Barrier to entry: Medium

5.1.4. Intensity of rivalry: Low to high

5.1.5. Threat of Substitution: Low to high

6 Market Entry Strategy

6.1. Market Regulation

6.1.1. The US defense industry is open to FDI

6.1.2. No offset policy exists in the US

6.1.3. US arms trade is heavily regulated

6.2. Market Entry Route

6.2.1. Foreign OEMs enter the market through the acquisition of domestic defense companies

6.2.2. Joint product development programs, an attractive market entry route

6.2.3. Formation of partnerships with domestic defense firms provide good market entry opportunities

6.2.4. Direct sale of defense equipment provides foreign OEMs with an opportunity to enter the market

6.3. Key Challenges

6.3.1. Decreasing economies of scale and defense inflation

6.3.2. Defense budget reductions result in project delays or cancellations

6.3.3. Declining profit margins deter growth of domestic defense companies

7 Competitive Landscape and Strategic Insights

7.1. Competitive Landscape Overview

7.2. Domestic Public Companies

7.2.1. Lockheed Martin Corp.: overview

7.2.2. Lockheed Martin Corp.: products and services

7.2.3. Lockheed Martin Corp.: recent announcements and strategic initiatives

7.2.4. Lockheed Martin Corp.: alliances

7.2.5. Lockheed Martin Corp.: recent contract wins

7.2.6. Lockheed Martin Corp.: financial analysis

7.2.7. Raytheon: overview

7.2.8. Raytheon: products and services

7.2.9. Raytheon: recent announcements and strategic initiatives

7.2.10. Raytheon: alliances

7.2.11. Raytheon: recent contract wins

7.2.12. Raytheon: financial analysis

7.2.13. General Dynamics: overview

7.2.14. General Dynamics: products and services

7.2.15. General Dynamics: recent announcements and strategic initiatives

7.2.16. General Dynamics: alliances

7.2.17. General Dynamics: recent contract wins

7.2.18. General Dynamics: financial analysis

7.2.19. Boeing: overview

7.2.20. Boeing: products and services

7.2.21. Boeing: recent announcements and strategic initiatives

7.2.22. Boeing: alliances

7.2.23. Boeing: recent contract wins

7.2.24. Boeing: financial analysis

7.2.25. L-3 Communications Corp.: overview

7.2.26. L-3 Communications Corp.: products and services

7.2.27. L-3 Communications Corp.: recent announcements and strategic initiatives

7.2.28. L-3 Communications Corp.: alliances

7.2.29. L-3 Communications Corp.: recent contract wins

7.2.30. L-3 Communications Corp.: financial analysis

7.2.31. Northrop Grumman Corp.: overview

7.2.32. Northrop Grumman Corp.: products and services

7.2.33. Northrop Grumman Corp.: recent contracts and strategic initiatives

7.2.34. Northrop Grumman Corporation: alliances

7.2.35. Northrop Grumman Corp.: recent contract wins

7.2.36. Northrop Grumman Corp.: financial analysis

7.2.37. Science Application International Corp. (SAIC): overview

7.2.38. Science Application International Corp. (SAIC): products and services

7.2.39. Science Application International Corp. (SAIC): recent contracts and strategic initiatives

7.2.40. Science Application International Corp. (SAIC): alliances

7.2.41. Science Application International Corp. (SAIC): recent contract wins

7.2.42. Science Application International Corp. (SAIC): financial analysis

7.2.43. Honeywell International Inc.: overview

7.2.44. Honeywell International Inc.: products and services

7.2.45. Honeywell International Inc.: recent announcements and strategic initiatives

7.2.46. Honeywell International Inc.: alliances

7.2.47. Honeywell International Inc.: recent contract wins

7.2.48. Honeywell International Inc.: financial analysis

7.3. Domestic Private Companies

7.3.1. Sikorsky Aircraft: overview

7.3.2. Sikorsky Aircraft: products and services

7.3.3. Sikorsky Aircraft: recent announcements and strategic initiatives

7.3.4. Sikorsky Aircraft: alliances

7.3.5. Sikorsky Aircraft: recent contract wins

7.3.6. General Electric Aviation: overview

7.3.7. General Electric Aviation: products and services

7.3.8. General Electric Aviation: recent contracts and strategic initiatives

7.3.9. General Electric Aviation: alliances

7.3.10. General Electric Aviation: recent contract wins

7.3.11. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.: overview

7.3.12. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.: products and services

7.3.13. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.: recent announcements and strategic initiatives

7.3.14. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.: alliances

7.3.15. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.: recent contract wins

7.3.16. Textron Marine and Land Systems: overview

7.3.17. Textron Marine and Land Systems: products and services

7.3.18. Textron Marine and Land Systems: recent announcements and strategic initiatives

7.3.19. Textron Marine and Land Systems: alliances

7.3.20. Textron Marine and Land Systems: recent contract wins

8 Business Environment and Country Risk

8.1. Demographics & Social Statistics

8.1.1. Total Rural Population

8.1.2. Total Urban Population

8.1.3. Number of households

8.2. Economic Performance

8.2.1. GDP Per Capita

8.2.2. GDP, Current Prices

8.2.3. Consumer Price Index

8.2.4. Wholesale Price Index

8.2.5. Local Currency Unit per Euro

8.2.6. Lending Rate

8.2.7. Real Interest Rate

8.2.8. Market Capitalization of Listed Companies

8.2.9. Market Capitalization of Listed Companies (% of GDP)

8.2.10. Government Cash Surplus/Deficit

8.2.11. Government Cash Surplus/Deficit as % of GDP

8.2.12. Central Government Debt

8.2.13. Central Government Debt as % of GDP

8.2.14. Goods exports as % of GDP

8.2.15. Goods imports as % of GDP

8.2.16. Goods Trade Surplus/Deficit as % of GDP

8.2.17. Service Imports as % of GDP

8.2.18. Service Exports as % of GDP

8.2.19. Service Trade Surplus/Deficit as % of GDP

8.2.20. Foreign Direct Investment

8.2.21. Net foreign direct investment as % of GDP

8.2.22. International reserves, including gold

8.3. Energy and Utilities

8.3.1. Conventional Thermal Electricity Net Generation

8.3.2. Hydroelectricity Net Generation

8.3.3. Nuclear Electricity Net Generation

8.3.4. Conventional Thermal Electricity Installed Capacity

8.3.5. Electricity Exports

8.3.6. Electricity Exports

8.3.7. Proved Natural Gas Reserves

8.3.8. Petroleum Consumption

8.3.9. Crude Oil Proved Reserves

8.3.10. Total Non-Hydro Renewable Electricity Net Generation

8.4. Infrastructure

8.4.1. Rail Lines

8.4.2. Air transport, freight

8.4.3. Overall Construction

8.5. Minerals

8.5.1. Mining, Manufacturing, Utilities Output

8.6. Technology

8.6.1. Research and Development Expenditure

8.6.2. Patents Granted

8.7. Telecommunication

8.7.1. Telephone Lines

8.7.2. Telephone Lines Penetration Rate

9 Appendix

9.1. About SDI

9.2. Disclaimer

List of Tables

Table 2: US Defense Expenditure (US$ Billion), 2013–2017

Table 3: USGDP Growth vs. Defense Expenditure Growth vs. Defense Expenditure as Percentage of GDP, 2008–2012

Table 4: US GDP Growth vs. Defense Expenditure Growth and Defense Expenditure as Percentage of GDP Growth, 2013–2017

Table 5: US Per Capita Defense Expenditure, 2008–2012

Table 6: US Per Capita Defense Expenditure, 2013–2017

Table 7: US Defense Budget Split by Base Budget, OCO, and Other Funds (US$ Billion), 2008–2012

Table 8: US Defense Budget Split by Base Budget, OCO, and Other Funds (US$ Billion), 2013–2017

Table 9: US Defense Budget Split Between Capital and Revenue Expenditure (%), 2008–2012

Table 10: US Defense Budget Split Between Capital and Revenue Expenditure (%), 2013–2017

Table 11: US Defense Expenditure Allocation for Army, Air Force, Navy, and Others (%), 2008–2012

Table 12: US Defense Expenditure Allocation for Army, Air Force, Navy, and Others (%), 2013–2017

Table 13: US Defense Budget Allocation for Army (US$ billion), 2008–2012

Table 14: US Defense Budget Allocation for Army (US$ billion), 2013–2017

Table 15: US Defense Budget Allocation for Navy (US$ billion), 2008–2012

Table 16: US Defense Budget Allocation for Navy (US$ billion), 2013–2017

Table 17: US Defense Budget Allocation for Air Force (US$ billion), 2008–2012

Table 18: US Defense Budget Allocation for Air Force (US$ billion), 2013–2017

Table 19: US Defense Budget Allocation for Other Expenditure(US$ billion), 2008–2012

Table 20: US Defense Budget Allocation for Other Expenditure (US$ billion), 2013–2017

Table 21: US Homeland Security Expenditure (US$ billion), 2008–2012

Table 22: US Homeland Security Expenditure (US$ billion), 2013–2017

Table 23: Benchmarking with Key Markets – 2008–2012 vs. 2013–2017

Table 24: Top Twenty Global Arms Exporters*, 2007–2011

Table 25: Top Twenty Global Arms Importers*, 2007–2011

Table 26: Lockheed Martin Corp – product focus

Table 27: Lockheed Martin Corp. – Alliances

Table 28: Lockheed Martin Corp. – Recent Contract Wins

Table 29: Raytheon – Product Focus

Table 30: Raytheon – Alliances

Table 31: Raytheon – Recent Contract Wins

Table 32: General Dynamics – product focus

Table 33: General Dynamics – Alliances

Table 34: General Dynamics – Recent Contract Wins

Table 35: Boeing – product focus

Table 36: Boeing – Alliances

Table 37: Boeing – Recent Contract Wins

Table 38: L-3 Communications Corp. – Product Focus

Table 39: L-3 Communications Corp. – Alliances

Table 40: L-3 Communications Corp. – Recent Contract Wins

Table 41: Northrop Grumman Corp.– Product Focus

Table 42: Northrop Grumman Corporation – Alliances

Table 43: Northrop Grumman Corp. – Recent Contract Wins

Table 44: Science Application International Corp. (SAIC) – Product Focus

Table 45: Science Application International Corp. (SAIC) – Alliances

Table 46: Science Application International Corp. (SAIC) – Recent Contract Wins

Table 47: Honeywell International Inc. – product focus

Table 48: Honeywell International Inc. – Alliances

Table 49: Honeywell International Inc.– Recent Contract Wins

Table 50: Sikorsky Aircraft – Product Focus

Table 51: Sikorsky Aircraft – Alliances

Table 52: Sikorsky Aircraft – Recent Contract Wins

Table 53: General Electric Aviation – Product Focus

Table 54: General Electric Aviation – Alliances

Table 55: General Electric Aviation – Recent Contract Wins

Table 56: Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. – Product Focus

Table 57: Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. – Alliances

Table 58: Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. – Recent Contract Wins

Table 59: Textron Marine and Land Systems – Product Focus

Table 60: Textron Marine and Land Systems – Alliances

Table 61: Textron Marine and Land Systems – Recent Contract Wins

List of Figures

Figure 2: US Defense Expenditure (US$ Billion), 2013–2017

Figure 3: US GDP Growth vs. Defense Expenditure Growth vs. Defense Expenditure as Percentage of GDP, 2008–2012

Figure 4: USGDP Growth vs. Defense Expenditure Growth and Defense Expenditure as Percentage of GDP, 2013–2017

Figure 5: US Per Capita Defense Expenditure, 2008–2012

Figure 6: US Per Capita Defense Expenditure, 2013–2017

Figure 7:US Defense Budget Split by Base Budget, OCO, and Other Funds (US$ Billion), 2008–2012

Figure 8: US Defense Budget Split by Base Budget, OCO, and Other Funds (US$ Billion), 2013–2017

Figure 9: US Defense Budget Split Between Capital and Revenue Expenditure (%), 2008–2012

Figure 10: US Defense Budget Split Between Capital and Revenue Expenditure (%), 2013–2017

Figure 11: US Defense Expenditure Allocation for Army, Air Force, Navy, and Others (%), 2008–2012

Figure 12:US Defense Expenditure Allocation for Army, Air Force, Navy, and Others (%), 2013–2017

Figure 13: US Defense Budget Allocation for Army (US$ billion), 2008–2012

Figure 14: US Defense Budget Allocation for Army (US$ billion), 2013–2017

Figure 15: US Defense Budget Allocation for Navy (US$ billion), 2008–2012

Figure 16: US Defense Budget Allocation for Navy (US$ billion), 2013–2017

Figure 17: US Defense Budget Allocation for Air Force (US$ billion), 2008–2012

Figure 18: US Defense Budget Allocation for Air Force (US$ billion), 2013–2017

Figure 19: US Defense Budget Allocation for Other Expenditure (US$ billion), 2008–2012

Figure 20: US Defense Budget Allocation for Other Expenditure (US$ billion), 2013–2017

Figure 21: US Homeland Security Expenditure (US$ billion), 2008–2012

Figure 22: US Homeland Security Expenditure (US$ billion), 2013–2017

Figure 23: SDI Terrorism Heat Map, 2012

Figure 24: SDI Terrorism Index, 2012

Figure 25: Benchmarking with Key Markets – 2008–2012 vs. 2013–2017

Figure 26: Defense Expenditure of the World's Largest Military Spenders (US$ Billion), 2012 and 2017

Figure 27: Defense Expenditure as a Percentage of GDP of Largest Military Spenders (%), 2012

Figure 28: Force Management Market Size (US$ Billion), 2012–2022

Figure 29: Networking/ Information Management Market Size (US$ Billion), 2012–2022

Figure 30: Fighters and Multi-role Aircraft Market Size (US$ Billion), 2012–2022

Figure 31: Cyber Security Market Size (US$ Billion), 2012–2022

Figure 32: Missile Defense Systems Market Size (US$ Billion), 2012–2022

Figure 33: Attack Aircraft MRO Market Size (US$ Billion), 2012–2022

Figure 34: Space Warfare Systems Market Size (US$ Billion), 2012–2022

Figure 35: Transport and Utility Aircraft Market Size (US$ Billion), 2012–2022

Figure 36: US Defense Import Trend (US$ Million), 2007–2011

Figure 37: US Defense Imports by Country (%),2007–2011

Figure 38: US Defense Imports by Category (%), 2007–2011

Figure 39: US Defense exports (US$ Million),2007–2011

Figure 40: US Defense Exports by Country (%),2007–2011

Figure 41: US Defense Exports by Category (%),2007–2011

Figure 42: Industry Dynamics – Porter's Five Forces Analysis

Figure 43: Lockheed Martin Corp. – Revenue Trend Analysis (US$ billion), 2007–2011

Figure 44: Lockheed Martin Corp. – Operating Profit Trend Analysis (US$ billion), 2007–2011

Figure 45: Lockheed Martin Corp. – Net Profit Trend Analysis (US$ billion), 2007–2011

Figure 46: Raytheon – Revenue Trend Analysis (US$ billion), 2007–2011

Figure 47: Raytheon – Operating Profit Trend Analysis (US$ billion), 2007–2011

Figure 48: Raytheon – Net Profit Trend Analysis (US$ billion), 2007–2011

Figure 49: General Dynamics – Revenue Trend Analysis (US$ billion), 2007–2011

Figure 50: General Dynamics – Operating Profit Trend Analysis (US$ billion), 2007–2011

Figure 51: General Dynamics – Net Profit Trend Analysis (US$ billion), 2007–2011

Figure 52: Boeing – Revenue Trend Analysis (US$ billion), 2007–2011

Figure 53: Boeing – Operating Profit Trend Analysis (US$ billion), 2007–2011

Figure 54: Boeing – Net Profit Trend Analysis (US$ billion), 2007–2011

Figure 55: L-3 Communications Corp. – Revenue Trend Analysis (US$ billion), 2007–2011

Figure 56: L-3 Communications Corp. – Operating Profit Trend Analysis (US$ billion), 2007–2011

Figure 57: L-3 Communications Corp. – Net Profit Trend Analysis (US$ billion), 2007–2011

Figure 58: Northrop Grumman Corp. – Revenue Trend Analysis (US$ billion), 2007–2011

Figure 59: Northrop Grumman Corp. – Operating Profit Trend Analysis (US$ billion), 2007–2011

Figure 60: Northrop Grumman Corp. – Net Profit Trend Analysis (US$ billion), 2007–2011

Figure 61: Science Application International Corp. (SAIC) – Revenue Trend Analysis (US$ billion), 2008–2012

Figure 62: Science Application International Corp. (SAIC) – Operating Profit Trend Analysis (US$ million), 2008–2012

Figure 63: Science Application International Corp. (SAIC) – Net Profit Trend Analysis (US$ million), 2008–2012

Figure 64: Honeywell International Inc. – Revenue Trend Analysis (US$ billion), 2008–2012

Figure 65: Honeywell International Inc. – Operating Profit Trend Analysis (US$ billion), 2008–2012

Figure 66: Honeywell International Inc. – Net Profit Trend Analysis (US$ billion), 2008–2012

Figure 67: US Rural Population (In Millions), 2008–2017

Figure 68: US Urban Population (In Millions), 2008–2017

Figure 69: US Number of Households (In Millions), 2008–2017

Figure 70: US GDP Per Capita, 2008–2017

Figure 71: US GDP, Current Prices (US$ Billion), 2008–2017

Figure 72: US Consumer Price Index, 2008–2017

Figure 73: US Wholesale Price Index, 2004–2013

Figure 74: Local Currency per Euro, 2008–2017

Figure 75: Lending Rate, 2008–2017

Figure 76: Real Interest Rate, 2008–2017

Figure 77: US Market Capitalization of Listed Companies (US$ Billion), 2004–2013

Figure 78: US Market Capitalization of Listed Companies (% of GDP), 2004–2013

Figure 79: US Government Cash Surplus/Deficit (LCU Billion), 2004–2013

Figure 80: US Government Cash Surplus/Deficit as % of GDP, 2004–2013

Figure 81: US Central Government Debt (LCU Bn), 2003–2012

Figure 82: US Central Government Debt as % of GDP, 2003–2012

Figure 83: US Goods Exports as % of GDP, 2004–2013

Figure 84: US Goods Imports as % of GDP, 2004–2013

Figure 85: US Goods Trade Surplus/Deficit as % of GDP, 2004–2013

Figure 86: US Service Imports as % of GDP, 2004–2013

Figure 87: US Service Exports as % of GDP, 2004–2013

Figure 88: US Service Trade Surplus/Deficit as % of GDP, 2004–2013

Figure 89: US Foreign Direct Investment (US$ Billion), 2004–2013

Figure 90: US Net foreign direct investment as % of GDP, 2004–2013

Figure 91: US International reserves, including gold (US$ Billion), 2004–2013

Figure 92: US Conventional Thermal Electricity Net Generation (Billion Kilowatt hours), 2003–2012

Figure 93: US Hydroelectricity Net Generation (Billion Kilowatt hours), 2003–2012

Figure 94: US Nuclear Electricity Net Generation (Billion Kilowatt hours), 2003–2012

Figure 95: US Conventional Thermal Electricity Installed Capacity (Million Kilowatts), 2003–2012

Figure 96: US Electricity Exports (Billion Kilowatt hours), 2003–2012

Figure 97: US Electricity Exports (Billion Kilowatt hours), 2003–2012

Figure 98: US Proved Natural Gas Reserves (Trillion Cubic Feet), 2002–2011

Figure 99: US Petroleum Consumption (Thousand Barrels Per Day), 2004–2013

Figure 100: US Crude Oil Proved Reserves (Billion Barrels), 2002–2011

Figure 101: US Total Non-Hydro Renewable Electricity Net Generation (Billion Kilowatts), 2003–2012

Figure 102: US Rail Lines (kms), 2003–2012

Figure 103: US Air transport freight (million ton-km), 2003–2012

Figure 104: US Overall Construction (US$ Billion), 2008–2017

Figure 105: US Mining, Manufacturing, Utilities Output (US$ Billion), 2003–2012

Figure 106: US Research and Development Expenditure, 2001–2010

Figure 107: US Patents Granted, 2004–2013

Figure 108: US Telephone Lines (In Million), 2003–2012

Figure 109: US Telephone Lines Penetration Rate (Per 100 People), 2004–2013

Companies Mentioned

To order this report:Aerospace_and_Defense Industry: Future of the US Defense Industry - Market Attractiveness, Competitive Landscape and Forecasts to 2017

Contact Clare: [email protected]
US:(339) 368 6001
Intl:+1 339 368 6001

SOURCE Reportlinker